-
Website
http://www.fanblogs.com/ -
Original page
http://www.fanblogs.com/bcs_poll/007843.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Tom_Blogical
937 comments · 13 points
-
TigerEducated
1588 comments · 36 points
-
"BC"
747 comments · 29 points
-
TampaGator
901 comments · 55 points
-
Ramblin' Gator
1029 comments · 50 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Fanblogs Open Conference Championship Thread
2 days ago · 137 comments
-
Weis Out at Notre Dame
4 days ago · 114 comments
-
Week Thirteen College Football Polls
5 days ago · 53 comments
-
Fanblogs Turkey Day/Thanksblogging Thread
1 week ago · 76 comments
-
Alabama and Auburn Through The Decades
1 week ago · 70 comments
-
Fanblogs Open Conference Championship Thread
Looks to me like Penn State has beaten #11 Ohio State - while Alabama owns a victory over #13 Georgia only. Alabama has played the 56th toughest schedule, while Penn State has played the 66th toughest, neither or which comes close to Texas' 7th or Florida's 10th toughest schedules. Both Alabama and Penn State are overranked IMHO.
Southern Cal is playing well, but they LOST TO OREGON ST, who was destroyed by Penn St...
Everyone needs to stop their bitching and just watch the fucking games, it will work itself out...
geezz
What's your gripe here? I don't think that I said one word about USC. I said that Penn State owns a win over Ohio State - which may outrank Georgia at the moment. Nevertheless, neither team is Top Ten material.
So then, you want to point out that Penn State hammered Oregon State, which beat USC. Looks like your confirming my idea that maybe Penn State has played some tougher teams than Alabama has. I'm only defending Penn State's position against Alabama. Looks like your doing the same thing. It's all a mute point - because Alabama is never gonna get past Florida. Penn State may well get to the NC game. If they do - they may not deserve to. Going unbeaten against the weakest schedule of all of the top rated teams - does not impress me too much.
OU's remaining schedule:
@ ATM
#2 Texas Tech
#9 Oklahoma State
It's a likely trap game for OU or any other BCS CG contender from the B-12...
But UF has to get by Vandy in Nashville and UF's favorite (soon to be second favorite) son in Hogtown...
Neither is a gimme...
arkansas and vandy are gimmes
you're forgetting about FSU and South carolina.
those are y'alls toughest games left. and of course, alabama...
I didn't forget about anything...
Hogtown = Gainesville...
UF's Favorite son (soon to be second) = Spurrier...
Vandy = Playing UF tough 60 % of the time over the last 19 seasons...
Noles = No input into the SEC CG chances...
Alabama = Still could screw up and miss the SEC CG...
i wasnt familiar with all of the florida football slang terms.
but anyway, Vandy is a gimme, and a loss to FSU would diminish your title hopes...
but i think "UFs favorite son" has the best chance of all.
he's got a tough team that's like Ole Miss on steroids. look out....
but of course, bottom line, for my money, a one-loss Florida will be playing an undefeated Alabama to see who gets in the BCS title game.
it will be a game for the ages.
Florida Football Slang terms?
Hogtown is known as often being used to describe Gainesville in derogatory terms...
UF's Favorite Son undoubtedly needs no explanation to anybody that is an SEC fan and knows anything about conference history...
Speaking of conference history I suggest you look back at the past ninteen seasons of UF/Vandy games and see exactly how many times a sub .500 Dore team has taken UF to the wire...
And since TP27 and I were discussing Bama and UF being in the SEC CG, the Noles have absolutley ZERO bearing on the discussion...
Seriously, my young snot nosed friend....
Read some books, do some research and pay attention to the conversation...
I drafted a reply to that post, but declined to post it--deferring to you, since it was aimed at you anyway.
Just baffling that you would have to "decode" any of that for a "SEC Fan".
b/t/w: you missed one other point: Ark'y, in the future tense.
So much material from such a small post....
GO GATORS!!
How would a 3 way tie in the Big 12 be handled?
We showed a SIGNIFICANT improvement in coverages, assignments, and getting the play in to the secondary on time...He played his responsibility and orchestrated the defense very well...
The guy is the much maligned nickelback in Danny McCray. He'll start for us next year, and if Curtis Taylor doesn't watch out, he'll take his job from him the rest of the way this year...
If we can stone the running game like we have against all but Florida & Georgia (Even against Georgia, they had two long runs, and other than that, were frustrated; they just did whatever they want through the air), then we can make it a game...
I do believe the early lines show that you'd be a TD favorite on a neutral field...I think it was -3 to open, though...
Since 2006, LSU has had less holding penalties called against it than any team in the conference...Any wonder we've had the best defensive line?
SEC officiating is a joke, but I wouldn't worry too much, at all...
Saban & Alabama hired Bobby Gaston's brother to work in their AD after he got there in a football related capacity...Considering Bobby is the head of officiating for the SEC Offices in Birmingham, I don't see a THING to worry about for you guys...
What do YOU have to do with something I asked of BC?
How many times will I repeat that my issue isn't with you, it's with BC's silly self? You are interjecting yourself into a discussion you have no business in, nor a vested interest in. Do you think that if you continue to post about it, then suddenly and magically I'll start to care?
That point has been proven multiple times with you continually deflecting my points with questions about my fandom.
First of all, I don't see how this is relevant to you accepting my bet. I didn't realize that this information was necessary for you to proceed with a conversation. But since you can't seem to get past this issue, I am a born and raised Florida Gator fan, but I attended and graduated from the University of Alabama. I will defend both schools, but if they play in Atlanta this year, I am a Gator fan first.
I'm sorry I didn't greet you with a big "Hey guys, I'm a huge Gator fan and all I care about is being a Gator fan. So from now on, I am going to preface each of my posts stating that I like the Gators so it will be clear to everyone!"
Take my bet.
Do you think if you continue to post or beg me to take the bet, that magically I suddenly care about it or I'll take you up?
Unless you're trained in the Jedi arts, you're sadly mistaken, so the quicker you get over yourself, the better for you...
I also figured you for an Alabama Fan...Just wanted to get it out there, as you've never stated one way or another...I apologize for being genuinely curious, as most others here clearly indicate who they're fans of. Sorry you're the only one who hasn't posted in a manner easy to figure that out.
Do yourself a favor...sh!t in one hand, and want me to give a sh!t about your posts in the other...You know the rest...But, please...Stop begging me to take you seriously or care about/give a damn about what you have to say when I'm talking to someone else.
So do yourself a favor and stop trying to wipe BC's bum for him...I have issue with HIM, and I really don't care-and I'm not sure how else I can emphasize how much I don't to you-about what you think of it...
Capisce?
"An interesting observation is that someone must tirelessly try to talk smack to someone who has done nothing to them, and then start personally attacking them, and then try to point out that THEY are the pathetic ones.
I encourage you to continue with your amateur hour psychiatry angles, as they really add so much to the discourse here...
You're offering up critques of people or calling their sexuality or manhood into question while most of us are talking college football.
I care no more for your act than you care for mine, so by all means, either continue to post your tripe about my manhood, or perhaps finally choke down that I could care less what you think of me or my "pathetic angles".
What I won't do is pass judgement on you from a personal level. I won't take personal shots at your coach. I won't level or take shots at the coaches or programs you support. All of which BC regularly does. All of which fuels my ire that I direct at him. All of which you ignore...
Fair enough...but, please...get this out of your system, so we can take this back to a friendly, collegiate football level...
If I see an opportunity to bust BC's chops, I'm going to take it, because he never EVER owns up to his own hypocrisy or bashing his team's players. He's a classic frontrunner, and has proven himself time and again in this respect.
What you do is your business, but we're just about getting to the point where this is tiresome, tedious and troublesome...So, how about this...
From here on out, if you want to, just say whatever you like. Talk about how I'm a homo, or get mad because your own fans talk smack they won't back up, how I'm pathetic, whatever...Just please don't expect me to respond anymore...
You can just say that I'm just too pathetic to bother...I really don't care... "
"No matter how much you interject, it won't sway my decision to tell you no...In other words, I don't care about what you think about what I say to BC, or what he's said to me...
Do you think if you continue to post or beg me to take the bet, that magically I suddenly care about it or I'll take you up?
Unless you're trained in the Jedi arts, you're sadly mistaken, so the quicker you get over yourself, the better for you...
I also figured you for an Alabama Fan...Just wanted to get it out there, as you've never stated one way or another...I apologize for being genuinely curious, as most others here clearly indicate who they're fans of. Sorry you're the only one who hasn't posted in a manner easy to figure that out.
Do yourself a favor...sh!t in one hand, and want me to give a sh!t about your posts in the other...You know the rest...But, please...Stop begging me to take you seriously or care about/give a damn about what you have to say when I'm talking to someone else.
So do yourself a favor and stop trying to wipe BC's bum for him...I have issue with HIM, and I really don't care-and I'm not sure how else I can emphasize how much I don't to you-about what you think of it...
Capisce?"
"What I wouldn't get carried away with is some guy who doesn't ever mention which team he's a fan of, talking to anyone about any discussion in regards to college football...
What do YOU have to do with something I asked of BC?
How many times will I repeat that my issue isn't with you, it's with BC's silly self? You are interjecting yourself into a discussion you have no business in, nor a vested interest in. Do you think that if you continue to post about it, then suddenly and magically I'll start to care?"
"Have you ever mentioned what team you're a fan of? Obviously you aren't a fan of LSU...
Oh, and I don't blow anyone, The_Observer...I'll leave that to experts like yourself...
I've already said I don't want to bet YOU, I want to bet BC... "
"What does it matter whether he's in college or he's a deckhand on a tugboat?
Please point to the "malicious" things I've said about his coach? Never have I denigrated his intelligence. I have pointed out-time and again-his tendencies and his mindset, gleaned from experience...Nothing more.
I have said-time and again-that I harbor no ill will towards Nick, though I see right through him.
I'm not sure there's an actual job title for "Fanblogs Revisionist Historian" here, Observer...perhaps you might want to work on said powers of Observation...They're failing you these days...
I'm quite comfortable in my own hypocrisy, but in this case, your drummed up allegations aren't even close to accurate...
You can call me out all you like, I have neither the time nor the inclination to get into some bellicose back-and-forth with the likes of you...
I'm interested to know who you root for, though... "
"The bet is an attempt to make little BC here shut his yapper...
I proved my point...He's actually afraid of a coach and a team filled with said coach's recruits, yet he refers to the coach as mindless and erratic...
Yet he doesn't stop yapping about him...He's like Paris Hilton's Chihuahua whose stumbled upon her coke stash...all hyped up for no real reason, barking not necessarily for a reason, but just to do it...
I knew he was more interested in taking a shot in my coach than in showing faith in his own team-which is a hallmark of his posting habits here. I merely wanted to point it out and take him down a few notches on the ladder of success he's found his team's moved a few rungs up on.
In other words, I'm not betting you, I only want to bet little B_C... "
Take my bet.
And I thought I was long winded...
Don't you have 60 posts to copy & paste, for no apparent reason?
BTW, cutting and pasting your post is crazy easy with Disqus.
Take the bet.
gotcha.
nick saban doesn't throw 70 yd. TD passes with the 1st string offense when up by 35?
you're right. we shouldn't be #1
we have a great running game and play possession offense instead of big play, big scoring?
okay....
we win games. every game. in the SEC. therefore, we are #1.
any questions?
You should have already figured that out by now.
You'll have no chance of ever winning that game. Alabama will be beat down by Florida by at least 24 points. Maybe next year though.
i'll bet you $1 with as many zeros as you want, that alabama won't lose by more than 10 points, if we lose.
trust me, we're verrrry over-rated....
It's on. I'd watch out how many zero's that you put behind that though. Alabama has a very good, strong and powerful, defense. You have not developed enough team speed to contain Florida. Florida will get to the edge - and your LB's are not fast enough to stop them. Florida will not be running the ball "up the middle" as many of your slower opponents have. And, Florida has the best OL in the country - not Alabama. Florida also has a tremendous defense. Alabama will not run on Florida either. And, since Alabama can't throw the ball, I have no idea how your gonna score at all. It'll be a blowout, son. I appreciate your loyalty here, but you have not been watching real good football teams, for quite some time. I have. And, I know what one looks like. And, Florida looks like the National Champion to me. The only team that might beat Florida for the rest of this season is USC, and as is stated in the BCS bylaws, USC can never be allowed to play an SEC Champion in a BCS Bowl game. That there is in "the rules".
ive realized that you, and the rest of the college football world forget a couple of things when it comes to alabama vs. florida:
1. Alabama laid a beatdown on the bulldawgs to. only it was in georgia, during the blackout game, when their team still had national championship dreams.
and we have a POSSESSION style offense that won't score as many points as florida and their run-and-gun. (only, we did still put up 41 on the dawgs).
2. Alabama did what florida couldn't do: take care of business at home against ole miss.
so. i happen to think that while florida is a great team, so is alabama, and when the two play, it will be a close, hard-fought game.
not a blowout by any means.
also another thing i think might help you change your mind.
cuz i know exactly where you're coming from.
you're basing your biased views on alabama's recent history of mediocrity.
i can't really blame you, but go check rivals.com, Alabama had the talent on their team even last year.
Alabama has really just been lacking leadership, team chemistry, and a business-like attitude that Saban has now 100% instilled into this team.
also, Saban's defense is VERY complicated, and it takes a couple of years to get it down completely.
you're right though, we don't have the depth and talent that florida has yet. but we're not too far off. but then we have better coaching and mentality.
team mentality doesn't mean anything?
well if the trojans and gators had it, there'd be 5 undefeateds at the top...
Like I've told you a thousand times - Alabama is well on their way. But, next year you'll probably have some kinda freshman QB over center. Next year might not be as good as this one. I am fully aware that Bama has had Top 20 recruiting classes for the last three years. I am well aware of what talent that they do have. Florida has had Top 5 classes for about four or five straight years. That is a huge difference. Top 20 seems pretty good - and it is. But, it is nothing like Top five classes are.
I'm really not tryin' to pick on you. I think that only Florida, USC and Penn State could beat Alabama this year. Your secondary is outstanding. The whole defense is what I would call good. And, I don't call too many defenses good. Your offense is lacking. The OL is very good. Coffee and Ingram are great backs. Julio Jones, along with a slew of other young WR's, are definately gonna be a force to be reckoned with. But, those receivers are very young. JP Wilson is a "servicable" QB at best. He has had some pretty good games - but he doesn't do it everytime out. His odds will be diminished against a team like Florida. The receivers will be covered. The only weakness in the Alabama team is the young WR's and the QB. Now, I liken Wilson to Matt Flynn, who won a MNC with LSU last year. So, in that regards, maybe it could be done. But, I kinda like to give the edge to last years Heisman winning QB, who happens to play for Florida - along with the junior WR called Percy Harvin. I think that Florida has a big edge in the QB and WR catagories. Also, the speed of Rainey and Demps lining up behind Tebow, create just too many mismatches for anybody to line up with. Honestly, I would not claim that Southern Cal could beat Florida. I only think that it might be interesting to find out.
Furthermore, a three point win over Mississippi, isn't hardly any different than a one point loss. It's only four points on the board. Florida's 39 point beatdown of Georgia, really sticks out by contrast, to Alabama having had to hold on in the 4th quarter. I suppose that if Florida were to fumble and throw some picks, then Alabama, could possible pull off an upset. What I will tell you for sure is this: Florida will be favored in that game. I will take Florida and whatever the line is - just like I did last weekend against Georgia.
After a few years of watching your team become very good - that's when your gonna realize what very good is. When Alabama can roll 50-60 points, without even really trying, then you will have reached the level of play that is consistant with a National Champion. When your reserves come in in the 2nd quarter, and still put up another 28 points, then you will know that you have arrived. Right now, Alabama must get off to an early lead, in order to hold off the other team in the 4th quarter. That is because there is a lack of depth. And, please don't tell me about how well you've played against Tennessee and Arkansas State. We'll find out this weekend if Alabama has taken another step upward. I'm still open to changing my mind as the team progresses.
Star will be a RS freshman, and AJ is probably going to get redshirted...
McCarron is 170-175 pounds, max...We have a guy on our board whose a family friend of theirs, and in order to get AJ's expressed promise not to follow his MLB dreams (He'll probably go in one of the top 10 rounds of the MLB draft pick), Saban had to promise his family they would not recruit anymore quarterbacks in this class.
That's somewhat unlike Saban, but AJ's family had close family friend ties to LSU, and Saban could not lose another Mobile recruit to LSU after the likes of JaMarcus Russell, Chevis Jackson, & Sidell Corley & Phelon Jones...
Alabama is having a wonderful year following up a great recruiting class this year, and they'll be back, but not until the 2010 season. They'll be trying to shut people down on defense next year, because on offense, they will be very one-dimensional with first-time starters.
i can agree with most of what you said.
except a couple of things:
1. losing isn't anywhere close to winning. they're two opposite worlds entirely. no matter the margin of victory or defeat
2. Alabama doesn't just come hot out the gate, and then hang on for dear life because they aren't conditioned.
it's the coaching scheme.
the coaches try to take the air out of the game in what Saban refers to as the "4-minute offense." there's a reason we never win by a large margin, and it has nothing to do with conditioning.
and if you acutally watched the Alabama/Georgia game, you would've known that the win was never in doubt.
Georgia scored a last second TD, recovered an onside kick, and scored another TD, all on our 2nd team defense in the last throes of the game. not to mention a punt returned for a TD.
our first team defense gave up 9 points. florida's gave up 10. florida scored 49, we scored 41.
we're pretty damn close.
not in depth, but in team.
I didn't say anything about "conditioning". Nevertheless, the most well conditioned athletes need a "blow" from time to time. Also, I did see the entire Bama/Georgia matchup, and do understand that the game was not in question. Still, Alabama was running out of gas in the 2nd half. That was not conditioning - it had way more to do with "lack of depth". One good thing that Alabama will have going for them: by the time they do play Florida, very many more of those young players, will have gained enough experience to maybe be able to provide some quality depth for that game. Earlier in the season - they simply were not able to do that. Alabama will probably have a little more gas at the end of the season than they've had in the beginning.
Gates even had some dudes that haven't seen the field this season out there...
Hell, there were cats that aren't even on the pre-season roster playing when the Dawgs finally got into the endzone...
all im trying to say is this:
people think that alabama will get beat by florida in the same way georgia did.
HELLO!!
we dominated georgia to!
we will more than hold our own against the gators. and im looking forward to what will be one helluva game.
Lose those two and there won't be any SEC CG if TE's boys win out...
see you in atlanta...
I got news for you...if you're worried about LSU making a game of it, Florida will TORCH you...
Florida has more speed on offense than any team in the conferenceon either side of the ball since LSU's defense in 2003 or Auburn's defense in 2004...
Period, point blank, they will TORCH anyone on the field with them...They got the fire lit under them after the Ole Miss loss, and they mowed through great competition in LSU & Georgia...Say what you want, but you gave up 30+ points to Georgia, and Florida THROTTLED THEM...
You will get your doors blown off by Florida. PERIOD.
Your tigers are going to lose to Alabama for $100.
Oh, and I don't blow anyone, The_Observer...I'll leave that to experts like yourself...
I've already said I don't want to bet YOU, I want to bet BC...
Nice comeback! "I'll leave it to the experts" LOL!
I know you don't want to bet me! You wouldn't want to bet ANYONE that you thought might actually TAKE the bet! You are pathetic man. You are a very talented writer, but some of your angles are truly pathetic.
If you must know, I grew up in Fort Lauderdale as a lifelong Gator fan, but I ended up attending the University of Alabama, so I have a great deal loyalty to that place.
I couldn't be enjoying this season any more thoroughly (unless Ole Miss didn't Ole Miss us). On top of that, my Alma Mater is undefeated!
So, just get off your knees and take my bet.
I encourage you to continue with your amateur hour psychiatry angles, as they really add so much to the discourse here...
You're offering up critques of people or calling their sexuality or manhood into question while most of us are talking college football.
I care no more for your act than you care for mine, so by all means, either continue to post your tripe about my manhood, or perhaps finally choke down that I could care less what you think of me or my "pathetic angles".
What I won't do is pass judgement on you from a personal level. I won't take personal shots at your coach. I won't level or take shots at the coaches or programs you support. All of which BC regularly does. All of which fuels my ire that I direct at him. All of which you ignore...
Fair enough...but, please...get this out of your system, so we can take this back to a friendly, collegiate football level...
If I see an opportunity to bust BC's chops, I'm going to take it, because he never EVER owns up to his own hypocrisy or bashing his team's players. He's a classic frontrunner, and has proven himself time and again in this respect.
What you do is your business, but we're just about getting to the point where this is tiresome, tedious and troublesome...So, how about this...
From here on out, if you want to, just say whatever you like. Talk about how I'm a homo, or get mad because your own fans talk smack they won't back up, how I'm pathetic, whatever...Just please don't expect me to respond anymore...
You can just say that I'm just too pathetic to bother...I really don't care...
Oh, and your too pathetic to bother.
(Rinse, repeat)
Take the bet, Papa wants some new shoes! (Courtesy of TigerEducated)
Tommy is giving Alabama 10 points.
Alabama has never lost by more than 7 under Saban.
I know you guys are "fired up" over your team this year. And, rightly so, as Bama has played fantastic. One great recruiting class does not get you the overall team speed that Florida has. You are forgetting your own mantra. The very best team that the SEC has to offer, will have more team speed, than it's nearest rival will have. My bet is that Florida, with numerous top recruiting classes, has way more team speed than Alabama has. And, that will win the game. Maybe you guys ought to really worry more about LSU in this coming week. It's not gonna be the "cakewalk" that you think that it will be. You may not get lucky twice in the same year.
Everybody hear that?? When Alabama goes out and dominates a good team, it's LUCK!
Alabama should not be the number 1 team because:
1) they don't blow their opponents out every week.
2) Nick Saban is the coach.
3) they play in the SEC.
4) all their "quality wins" have resulted from luck.
5) these wins that would have been a "quality win" before the game was played, now is a win against "an overrated team".
BS.
Bama is #1...FOR THIS WEEK! All you haters think that us Bama fans automatically think that this means we will win out and play in the NC game. Wrong. All it means is that Alabama can only itself. Let me tell you this, the LSU game will not be a "cakewalk" by any means, and we know this.
Florida is Florida, and we'll worry about them once we win the West.
That's just an opinion, but its a pretty informed one...
Having said that, I have on reason to say that you aren't #1, and I do not think you've gotten here by luck...
When Florida is up for a game, they are not going to be beaten. Period.
We can agree to disagree, and considering you're a fan of Alabama, I can see why you would...
I'm just saying that I have seen them place twice, and I've watched you cats play a few times, as well, and the disparity in speed is redonkulous...You are tooled and schemed to stop an offense that doesn't exist in Gainesville...You also don't have the depth to compete with the speed on the field...
You are a very bad matchup against Florida...
Sorry, but that's just my opinion...
Yes, I have watched Florida play in many games this year. That Florida team that played Ole Miss is NOT the same team that played LSU and Georgia. This new found team is scary good - as I stated in another post.
When I said we'll "worry about them" I wasn't saying Bama would win. If it ends up Bama-Florida in ATL, then we'll worry about Florida then. Not now. We have business to finish. :)
...Starting with your team this weekend! ;)
The "luck" is that Georgia isn't their normally "very good" selves this year. Neither is LSU. That would be the 2nd "luck". If those two teams were up to their usual standards, this might have been a completely different year, in very many aspects.
But you have to give credit where credit is due.
Bama is 9-0. Nothing can be done about how the teams that were supposed to be great turned out to be a disappointment. All Bama can do is continue to win and their fate is in their own hands.
But I don't think it's "luck" how the season has turned out so far. Auburn was supposed to be good. Clemson was supposed to be good. Georgia was supposed to be great. Bama was supposed to be decent at best. "Luck" has nothing to do with any of that. It's simply who is executing and who is not.
So far, Alabama is. That's all I'm sayin'...
Are you new? Yawn....So, you think that a playoff might be benificial for some really good teams? Or, do you think that it will only benefit Southern Cal? If you believe that USC would benefit the most - then that would be the reason that it will probably not happen. Good luck getting that legislation past the SEC, Big 10 and Big 12 conferences.
Just like the Georgia fans thought they had a shot...You are simply not watching them play if you don't see what they do in space...
They are faster than Usain Bolt after a hit off a crackpipe...
Your defense is built to stop the zone run game that teams like Georgia & LSU run, but they put the rush game into space, and they will eat you alive.
Florida is the class of this conference, and its not up for debate...
Just like I won't ever pick LSU to lose, I'll more likely than not never pick Alabama to win, though when most were talking up Kentucky, I predicted an easy win for you all, as I did with Tennessee...
idk. i really dont.
i do know that unless you load the box, wilson won't have to pass.
i also know that if wilson is pressured, he isn't worth a damn.
but i also know that he can get lucky on a deep ball every once in a while.
so i have no clue.
wilson has proven to me that he won't LOSE the game for us, but he's still yet to prove that he can win it for us.
Gators are traditionally played tough by Vandy and Spurrier is like a fox sneakin' in the henhouse when he comes to the Swamp...
Even peek past either to look at a SEC CG shot and they'll drop one...
That's not even counting the freakin' game against Fraudulently Scholastic U...
Who would love nothing more than to a put a veer in the course for a MNC shot...
Please take a look at the 4th line...
Or...
Forcibly Subdued University in honor of Geno "Taze" Hayes...
Of course, I'm a homer. :-)
B) The amount of BCS points earned by thuis pack are much closer to what one would expect for an ORV team, indicating that this pack really does not belong in the top 25. Maybe one could argue this pack all just barely qualify for the top 25.
8 North Carolina @ 1 Alabama
5 Oklahoma State @ 4 Utah
6 TCU @ 3 Florida
7 Georgia @ 2 Texas
8 Ball State @ Texas Tech
5 Boise State @ 4 USC
6 Ohio State @ 3 Oklahoma
7 Missouri @ 2 Penn State
only the truest poll in college football.
i take the current top 10 BCS standings, and rearragne them to make more sense.
using the following formula:
2 parts talent, 1 part SOS, 1 part record
talent
1. USC
2. Florida
3. Alabama
4. Oklahoma
5. Penn State
6. Texas
7. Texas Tech
8. Oklahoma State
9. Boise State
10. Utah
SOS
1. Texas
2. Florida
3. Alabama
4. Oklahoma State
5. Oklahoma
6. Texas Tech
7. USC
8. Penn State
9. Utah
10. Boise State
record
T1. Alabama
T1. Texas Tech
T1. Penn State
T1. Utah
T1. Boise State
T6. Florida
T6. USC
T6. Oklahoma State
T6. Oklahoma
T6. Texas
BC POLL
1. Alabama - 10
2. Florida - 12
3. USC - 15
T4. Oklahoma - 19
T4. Penn State - 19
T4. Texas - 19
7. Texas Tech - 21
8. Oklahoma State - 26
9. Boise State - 29
10. Utah - 30
i love this poll. "it takes out the BS in the BCS, and just gives you the BC"
How is Ball State not tiesd for #1 with Record? Is 9-0 not better than 8-0?
(edited to remove non top 10)
Record:
T1: Texas Tech (9-0)
T1: Alabama
T1: Penn State
T1: Utah
5: Boise State (8-0)
T6: Texas (8-1)
T6: Oklahoma
T6: Oklahoma State
T9: Florida (7-1)
T9: USC (7-1)
This would put Florida to 15, USC to 18 and Bosie State to 33.
and i'm just focusing on the BCS top 10, and rearranging them, so Ball State isn't in the mix.
I gotta step out and take care of some business. I'm curious to see how the real recruiting numbers line up with: "the talent portion is based on my keen eye for talent, combined with my knowledge of past recruiting class rankings".
I'm gonna combine the "Scout and Rivals" ratings for the last five years. What we're gonna be looking for is the "average rating" of each player recruited. The last five years will be used, as there are very many RS Seniors, dotting everybody's rosters for this year. We'll also take in how many players were recruited. Keep in mind: the more players that were recruited = the more players that "bombed out" or could not cut it in class. I think that NCAA college football teams are limited to 84 scholarship athletes. So, the average number of recruits per season, should be around 18-19 - of which about half will be redshirted. Keep in mind: that a large recruiting class does not necessarily equate to "the best class". It's the "average rating" per player that is the critical issue. I will show you those ratings later this evening. We'll see who all is really in the Top Ten. That is your yardstick. I will not be surprised to see both Florida and LSU in the Top Five overall.
talent is more than rivals.com. it's also how the talent is developed.
for example, you know with a good coaching staff like Carroll, Saban, and Meyer, that the talent is being developed very well.
but look at Notre Dame. they are probably in the top 5 over the last 5 years, but they can't develop.
look at Texas on the defensive side of the ball.
and also, im just looking at the BCS top 10, and rearranging them.
i dont have time to rank the top 25 like that.
my keen eye for talent, and SOS, is what makes the BC Poll, well, the BC poll...
Here you go. This is the "Scout Rating". We can add Tennessee, Penn State and Texas Tech just for some giggles. This will give us fifteen teams to look at.
Scout Ratings for 2004/2008 (last five years):
1). Southern Cal (19.2) 4.13
2). Florida (23.6) 3.79
3). Texas (21.0) 3.66
4). Michigan (22.0) 3.59
5). Georgia (22.2) 3.58
6). Ohio State (19.8) 3.57
7). L.S.U. (23.6) 3.56
8). Miami (Fla.) (23.2) 3.47
9). Oklahoma (22.4) 3.45
10). Tennessee (24.4) 3.37
11). Florida State (25.8) 3.33
12). Penn State (20.6) 3.28
13). Alabama (27.4) 3.10
14). Auburn (26.2) 2.99
15). Texas Tech (24.6) 2.72
Bleed, once again, this is very interesting. You are right about Penn State - they sure don't have too much talent. Looks like I'm right about Texas Tech - as they don't have much either. Once again, both Alabama and Auburn, have the highest turnover of all teams. And this time, USC, Ohio State, Penn State and Texas have the lowest turnover ratios.
Again, Bleed, it is very interesting to me that both scouting services have Southern Cal and Florida ranked #1 and #2. Meanwhile, they don't seem to be too impressed with Alabama's overall recruiting classes over the last five years. Are you still willing to risk even one lousy dollar on the Florida game? And, Bleed, please stop with the "coaching crap" - as most all of these teams have very fine coaching. Do you understand what I am talking about yet? You don't have enough talent. The higher turnover rates make for an even younger team than normal. Alabama does not have enough talent or experience to win a MNC. Penn State and Texas Tech look just about equally as bad.
and you're right. on paper, Alabama gets crushed by USC and Florida, and there's no way they can win a NC. and i agree that it is unlikely that Alabama can beat either of these teams at this point due to the difference in depth and talent.
but you know what they say. any given saturday my friend...
but look, when looking at depth, past recruiting rankings mean everything, because you haven't seen the backups play yet.
however, when it comes to on-field talent, you can just watch them on TV.
any amatuer can tell that Alabama's defense is better than Georgia's, although recruiting rankings will disagree.
and how do you explain things like: alabama's best saftey, all-SEC Rashad Johnson was a walk-on...
as far as on-field talent goes, you've just gotta watch.
NFL scouts don't look at high school recruiting rankings, they watch the games.
catch my drift?
Every program has walk-ons. Alabama is not the only team that builds up players. USC has Clay Matthews, Jr. playing at LB and DE. He may be a 1st round NFL draft choice. He is a walk-on player. We have had several others. We've had many 3-star recruits become All-American's. It happens all day long at many schools. It's a matter of recruiting - once again. You do understand that you have to evaluate your walk-ons don't you? It's a matter of evaluating talent. I'm not knocking your coach. I know that he knows talent. My point is that he's only been there two years. Anybody that he has brought in - has not even made a full impact yet. Don't even tell me about Julio Jones. He's nothing compared to what he will be. He looks great to Bama fans because it's all you got right now. Mike McCoy could not start for most teams. Recruiting is what wins games. And then the recruits have got to gain experience. The more the merrier. You can argue until your blue in the face. I haven't overlooked anything. I understand football inside and out. You can keep bringing up your hypothetical's, "Well, did you think of this or that", but it doesn't change the fact that Alabama is gonna be outgunned at some point. Saban has done a masterful job at keeping you unbeaten so far. Why don't you go and ask Nick Saban if he disagree's with me? I'll bet you your "Girlfriend's Daddy's Estate" that he knows exactly what Alabama is facing down.
Sorry, but I'm gonna post it anyway, as I promised. Besides, Notre Dame does not rate. There are twelve different teams that ranked in the "Rivals" Top 25 in all of the last five years. As I mentioned before, with (84) scholarships to hand out, the average would be around 18-19 per year (with about half a class being redshirted). The number in parenthesis is the average number of scholarships handed out for each year. The other number is the average player rating.
Rivals Top 25 recruiting classes (last five years):
1). Southern Cal (20.4) 4.01
2). Florida (23.4) 3.73
3). L.S.U. (23.6) 3.66
4). Texas (20.8) 3.62
5). Oklahoma (23.0) 3.61
6). Georgia (23.0) 3.59
7). Ohio State (19.6) 3.57
8). Michigan (21.6) 3.56
9). Florida State (23.8) 3.53
10). Miami (Fla.) (23.8) 3.39
11). Alabama (27.8) 3.30
12). Auburn (26.4) 3.15
Just as I might have suspected, Bleed. Not only does Alabama have a low talent rating - they also have the highest turnover of all of these teams. Curiously, both Alabama and Auburn have high turnover margin compared to all these other teams. It means that many players can't cut it either in the classroom or on the football field. The lowest turnover margins are with Ohio State, USC and Texas. These three schools seem to be more able to recruit players who are gonna stay on the field. These are the actual recruiting ratings. You can clearly see which teams might have the most talent in the country. It really is not surprising at all. And, it kinda points to the fact that "coaching" really does not have to do with much. It seems to indicate that talent will win you alot of games. I'll post the "Scout" ratings for you next. Enjoy these.
coaching doesn't mean much?
then why do Michigan, Miami, and Auburn all suck this year?
how did Alabama lay an absolute beatdown on Georgia in Athens?
coaching is everything in college football...
Aided on every scoring drive except 2 by penalies or turnovers and you still had to hold on to win.
Dont make me give you the play by play, but Georgia handed you that game.
If you can finish out with wins over LSU,Miss St. AU, and Florida then ill have no doubt that your deserving of a #1. But for now youve only beat 1 team ranked in the top 43 in the country you need to just chill.
And btw they did get distroyed but it was by Florida not Bama
Could have helped out our SOS come November 29th..
No, I'n not over-looking anyone. Especially the two Tiggers left on the schedule...
;)
Both teams in the Iron bowl have a rich history of knocking off the stronger team on paper, and frankly, that's about all we Barners have to cling to now, along with our guns and religion...
I think I referenced the "sucks" part with SOS.
Get past your "gauntlet" of a schedule remaining undefeated, and then come back and we can talk about who's number one..
;)
so that's the tune auburn will be singing after thanksgiving weekend.
"six out of seven...."
haha.
typical auburn fans. living in the past...
ROFLMAO
this coming from a Bama fan- purty funny BC
I'm focused on LSU at the moment, and looking forward to my trip down to Red Stick this weekend.
Miss St. should not be over-looked either - as we have been "Croomed" the past two years.
Then, the good ol' Iron Bowl. Auburn will play the best game they've played all year, no doubt about it. (Not that they have to try really hard to accomplish that ;) )
And IF we get through those games unharmed, we will focus of Florida.
Speaking of the LSU game this weekend, I ran across this billboard that will "welcome" Saban back to Red Stick...
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar...
Nice people, those LSU fans.. :)
My point btw is is a good point. And so is yours but im a bit down now that the Babe has slammed me.
come back when you've recovered from your season.
youre obviously a little shaken up right now.
understandable.
soon you'll get back in the groove of things.
Alabama - big | Auburn - small
i know you forgot over the past 6 years...
BOOMER!
Coaching and game strategy do play a large part. It's even easier with more talent. Auburn had a terrible recruiting class (by their standards) four and five years ago. Throw in the "new spread offense", because of that lack of talent, and Auburn is primed for a bad year. When Tuberville was recruiting well - he was a great coach. Now, that he isn't - he's not. I'm not so sure that Randy Shannon is a great coach. Miami does have talent and is not winning. I suspect that they could have done better. Rich Rod has mangled up Michigan pretty good. He's even figured out how to destroy the defense. Seems as if he can't figure out Big 10 offenses. But, all of the other coaches are pretty good. Read my post again. I said, "Most of the coaches".
I realized after postin gthat BC had specifically stated that he only considered the current top 10.
Ball State does not fit. I should have edited that line that refered to them as well.
i've got you at #4!
that's not bad considering a loss to texas TECH is it?
TECH man. any school that loses to a TECH, can't honestly expect to go to the NC game.
haha
Right now they are undefeated and will face tough teams from here on out.
please read my comments below on this thread and try to understand that Bama wouldnt stand a chance of running the table in the B-12 and yall will probably drop a couple before its over, man I would love to see a Texas vs Bama or Texas vs Fla Bowl game, then after yall lose, you can continue with your Bias rants.
The Bama team that I've seen couldnt stop TTech, OK State, or OU much less Texas, keep on dreaming because yall might get a chance to face one of those teams and they will give yall a better game than PSU
Hookem-Horns
Alabama will most likely either play for the NC or play in the Sugar Bowl, and i dont think a B12 team can play in either of those games.
but just a thought:
if TT's defense could shut down colt mccoy, imagine how bad he'd do against Alabama, with better defenders at every position...
and if TT's O-line could dominate y'all's D-line, imagine how big the holes would be against an SEC O-line with 2 '09 NFL first rounders and 2 all-SECers....
we lost to LSU and Auburn.
and
LSU wins their remaining games.
if that doesn't happen, we're at least going to the Sugar Bowl.
i think we could drop that game.
but no way will we lose 2 out of the remaining 3.
FYI Texas rush defense is one of the best nationally and yall couldnt run the as ball effectively as you might think, yall would be forced to throw the ball and yall couldnt hang with that kind of offensive shootout. The only hope would be to grind it out on the ground and keep it away from the Texas offense.
why don't you look and see how they rank in defending the pass....OUCH
and lemme tell ya. if Texas Tech could dominate your D-Line, then Alabama would pancake your entire line on every play.
The only offensive line in the country that i'd consider being better than Alabama's would be LSU's
This Texas team has never faced a team like Alabama.
they'll dominate you up front, force you to go one-on-one with receivers, then we'll hit you with a big pass to make you come back to your senses.
Texas would in no way be able to stop Alabama's offensive attack. Texas simply doesn't have the defensive front to match up with their running game.
the question is whether or not Alabama would be able to stop Texas' offense.
The Answer:
If Texas Tech could put McCoy in the dirt, and shake him up, then Alabama would bring significant pressure on every play.
Alabama's defensive front is top-notch. we rank in the top 5 nationally in stopping the run, and we've faced Knowshon Mareno, CJ Spiller, and James Davis.
and if you think for a second that any of your receivers will EVER have good seperation, you are wrong. like those big TD passes McCoy throws where the receiver has 10 yds on the closest defender - - those never happen against Alabama.
in our secondary we have two All-SECers, one of the nation's best kick returners, and the best secondary coach in the country - Nick Saban...
don't get me wrong, Colt would still pass the ball. but i think y'all would only score about 10 points on our defense, we would dominate TOP, and we'd put up about 31 on y'alls defense.
as the nation saw in the TT game, Colt can't handle pressure very well...
we dominated in Athens in front of 90,000+ for a blackout game
we dominated in Knoxville in front of 100,000+ for a rivalry game
but we'd fall apart in front of a sold out high school stadium....
BTW I think Jones stadium holds 56,000 if Im not mistaken
BOOMER!
the game was in the middle of the day, the team was falling apart, and the culmination was an embarrassing loss at home.
that was 2007. this is 2008.
and how does that in any way prove that Lubbock's 56,000 stadium is more intimidating than Athens, Knoxville, and the GA Dome?
they don't play defense worth a damn.
i hear the announcers hyping up TT's big ol' 290 lb nose tackle who's been wreaking havoc all game long...
what would Texas do against Alabama's 370 lb. nose?
who manhandled last year's rimington trophy winner (also in the SEC).....
i see receivers wide-ass open all game long, and QBs having 10 seconds to get the ball out.
say what you will, but the SEC has the best defensive fronts in the country. NO QUESTION. even in our down year. also, the best Offensive lines to counter it. NO QUESTION.
I think it's a shame that because of the media's love affair with the longhorns, they will get the nod over a one-loss Florida or Alabama.
despicable...
Tebow was throwing 225 up 25 times as a freshmen...
Which converts to roughly a 676 lb. one rep press...
After three springs and summers of conditioning, he more than likely will bench press your car...
However, the BP and it's pectoral isolation is a relatively useless exercise in training for performance...
Much more important are multi-group lifts like C&J and Squats...
Which Timmy also happens to lift with the lineman because it's the only group that can keep up with him in lifting...
But when matched up with his ability to lead and manage the offense...
He's most dangerous takin' the snaps...
Career numbers of tossing 51TDs to 9 INTs pretty much solidifies his worth as a QB...
BOOMER! Wreck'Em (at least this weekend)
he never really makes a lot of tackles.
his main job is to occupy 2 blockers, push the pocket, and to keep blocks off of our LBs
he is REALLY effective. which is why he is projected to go NFL after 1 year in Div 1A football.
I sure hope so- aint no way yall could outscore Texas
Yalls outstanding D hasnt faced any outstanding O's
That Texas D would do well against that Bama O if our defense aint worth a dam
how come we held Arkanas to 10 points and Bama gave up 14? to the same team
I saw an outstanding defensive performance against the #1 offense in the country
I saw a true freshman drop an interception and another miss a tackle against the #1 receiver in America- with 1 second left.
Media dont love us- they like Fla, OU, USC etc etc
We got to earn it- yall will probably drop one and meet Texas in a Bowl
I cant wait
Hookem-Horns
And I was impressed until TT let the Horns back in it and needed a desperation toss up and missed tackle to win...
I'll tell you now, young Tyler, where the lack of respect stems from...
Watching the lower or unranked team in the B-12 CG win 50% of the time since it's inception...
The .468 win percentage in the BCS...
It's just hard to take the B-12 seriously...
"The way both of our lines went at each other was some really really good quality action"!
What? I didn't see any line play at all. I saw defensive linemen waltzin' up toward the QB. I did see McCoy on the ground about two or three times - but I never saw Harrell hit the turf even once. I'm sorry - that's not quality line play. Wide Receivers were open all over the field. Cause: lack of defensive pressure. No blitzing at all. No defense - period! Watch some other games, where somebody might play some defense, and you might come to understand what quality line play looks like.
brag about your line play all you want as yall rack up wins against Wash & Wash St
You all right, man? You seem pretty shook up. You still have a great shot. Just win out, take the Big 12 title, and your probably in. I think that Texas Tech is gonna lose to Oklahoma State maybe. And, I'm very certain that Oklahoma is gonna kill them. Longhorns are gonna be just fine. It's only one very unlucky loss.
My prediction OK state @ TTech- either way- OK state won last year, but now both teams are better, the home team has the edge, but anything can happen
Cowboys over Raiders-tossup home team Raiders
Raiders over Sooners-tossup home team Sooners
Cowboys over Sooners-tossup home team Cowboys
Tommie I'm a Horns fan so I always pull against the Sooners- I'll even pull for A&M this weekend
Kinda reminds me of the wineing coach thread, but lets not revisit that one Ron, Texas Tech,Oregon,TCU seems like the Sooners have really been victums alot- sorry man- you right-I cant stop laughing Ron
Look bud -you brought it up-not me
Hookem-Horns
http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-g...
You know Ron you cant give Leech & co 88 seconds with a 1 point lead, drop INT and miss tackles when its all on the line, kinda sad for the two freshman DBs.
BTW I saw a pair of foxes prior to the game and though it was a good omen, later after the game-I thought maybe the two foxes symbolized- Leech & Brown
Foxes are red and they raid "chicken coops" or any other small animal they can get their hands on. So, the "Omen" was that they were "Red Raiders". The only part that I can't figure out, is how in the world, did they mistake a "Longhorn" for a very small animal?
BTW they ought to change the name of TTech Red Raiders to Black Raiders
In the old SWC days it was white helment and red jersy
Wow...
And I thought I smoked a lot of weed...
I just looked outside and saw a racoon
of course its not game day-so it really doesnt mean anything- come to think of it- a racoon has a mask kinda like a Red Raider
Its not gameday- Sunday I saw a black deer doesnt really mean anything either
but what if on last Saturday I'd seen a pair of skunks instead of foxes?
Look I'm the kinda person that spits twice after a black cat croses my path.
Now I'm begining to think the foxes represented Harrel & Crabtree
it goes both ways- the games over
Texas lost the game- gotta focus on BU now
Hookem-Horns
BOOMER!
Hookem Horns
CFB is all about luck...
You need luck for the right teams to lose in front of you when you're simmering near the edge...
We certainly saw luck last Sat evening in Lubbock on that desperation heave into double coverage and the following inexplicable missed tackle...
I'd say luck is easily 25 percent of the mix in CFB...
Man, your not hearing what the man is saying. In the Big 12 - this is a designed play. The offense knows that no amount of guys can cover anybody, and as soon as they catch it, nobody is gonna tackle them. Any pass at all will work 99% of the time in the Big 12 conference. These guys could not defend a pass if NATO themselves were callin' the shots!
Read your own comment...
You just credited "luck" for TT to have the time to be able to even have the shot at winning...
"Luck" is a big part of sports...
Period...
It's not a "timing" route, goofy...
It's a "read" route...
Harrell's job on that play is to "read" where the corner is and make the decision to either throw it above or behind depending on the positioning of the defender...
I can't believe I just had to explain your own team's offensive strategy to you...
The "lucky" part is that Earl Thomas was apparently playing the ball rather than taking the bead on Crabtree...
No idea what he was thinking there...
Jealousy is an ugly thing.
LOL...
Well Bama is 9-0 at this point and that is to be commended.
However, regardless of what people want to say about the tough SEC the numbers speak for themselves.
What appeared to be a very tough schedule at the begining of the year has turned out to be somewhat of a cream puff. with only 1 win of a team ranked higher then 43 i dont quite understand how they get so much SOS consideration.
Clemson ranks 58, Tulane103, Western Kentucky120, Akansas 55, Georgia 11,Kentucky 51, Miss
43, Tenn 69,ARK st.92.
Now compare that to Penn states 3 teams ranked 39 or higher kind of makes you wonder what they are thinking.
This weekend will be a tougher test but i think they match up well with them.
Wake up dude! Where were these teams ranked when Alabama played them?
Hookem-Horns
Geaux Tigers
Go Cowboys
Gigem-Aggies
Having played both Bama and FLA, I give the edge to FLA just for the kill mode they are in right now. I agree with Ramblin Gator (I can't believe I just said that) but they are taking care of business better than any team in the SEC right now. I think everyone will see what I am talking about after the LSU-Bama game this weekend. I think Les and the boys will beat BAMA. BAMA has been on auto pilot and I think that LSU will sneak one out in Baton Rouge.
On another shocking subject brought forth by a member of the SEC, I think the two best teams played this past weekend and they aren't from the SEC; TX and TX Tech would beat any of the SEC teams on the National stage. I know BC thinks the D is weak in the Big 12 and I have to agree that they do give up the points, but FLA gave up 398 yards to the DAWGS. It won't be any different against a TX or TX Tech. The only difference will be about 100 more yards and they won't stall in the redzone. FLA will have to outscore them, and they might, but I doubt it. BAMA sure as hell wouldn't do it.
Anyway, that's what my head thinks, but my heart says go Commadores and Gamecocks. Beat those sorry a$$ jean shorts-wearing Gators!
GO DAWGS!!--the homer is back
Good luck the rest of the season
Adios Tomcat
If this system were in place, you might convince Joe Pa to come down South and take on a SEC or Big 12 team. He would have nothing to lose and everything to gain by taking on potential conference champions.
The game as a whole would be better because teams would stop playing down into Div 1 FCS to pick up easy wins. Every game would count as the non-conference wins the cellar dwellers rack up would raise the standing of the whole conference. As the season approaches the end, every game would be worth more as the wins add up, just like a playoff.
The bowl games would mean so much more because all the wins would mix at the end creating a very dynamic three weeks of football.
Think about it.
It makes way too much sense. It can never be. There would be no way to actually manipulate the National Championship game - and make it fair for all. We would not have "political correctness" in college football. And, as we all know, that would be mean spirited. It would be better if we just quit complaining and just excepted all of this injustice. It's the "American Way".
So what your saying is that if an SEC team beats the sun belt champ in regular season they get a point for every win the sunbelt champ had that year?
Well if thats what your saying thats nuts.
ill give you an example, Oklahoma distroyed TCU. TCU is 9-1 in the mountain west with wins over powerhouses like Stephin Austin,unlv and the likes. And your suggesting Oklahoma get a point for every win TCU gets because they beat them?
And then somehow you think that will encourage teams like Penn State to play tougher competetion. Maybe i just didnt understand your system.
Your argument does make sense. I've always proposed some kinda of "initial rating system" similar to our current BCS standing. Then, there are 120 Division I teams, that can be ranked. You would accumulate 120 points for a win over the #1 rated team, 111 points for a win over the 10th rated team, and 1 point for a win over the 120th rated team.
These rankings would flucuate every week as each game was being played. But, in the end, you would tally up all "points earned" - and the Top Two would play for the National Championship. This would give us many more competitive games played on the field. This would cut out all of the non-sense of scheduling Division II teams and much lower rated mid-major and BCS opponents. The "run for the National Championship" would finally get real.
I'm interested in hearing you explain the UGA win. I also want to hear how UGA handed the game to Bama.
Ready. Set. Go.
Ill just say this, on your first drive you would have had to settle for a field goal try if not aided by a 15 yard penaly on 3rd down.so we can -4. On Bama second possesion same thing 25 yards of penalties possibly -3.
Bamas 3rd possesion was a nice drive.
4th possesion was on a fumble by Georgia where noone even hits Green he just fumbles.
Well any way you get the point. Bottom line is you got the W. But IMO it wasnt a dominate start to finish performance like Florida had this weekend against Georgia.
Now when they got the pick in the 3rd quarter, feel free to call it dominate all you want from that point on. Absolutely outrageous performance by the DAWGS from that point on. I have not seen anything like it since the Ray Goof days. Florida took us to the wood shed and beat that a$$. Let's here it for the Commadores this weekend. Blackdawg, where you at man?
GO DAWGS!!
It's a simple question about UGA that nobody can seem to answer...
You wanna take a crack at it?
What's the question? I will give it a shot?
I think that before he passed out with the "Gas Mask" wrapped around his head, that ol' GatorHippy was probably wonderin', if the "Gonj" up at the UGA was as good as the "Chronic" that he was coppin' down in Florida? Sadly, he hasn't "come to" yet. Must be some pretty good sheeeeit!
brilliant seeing how we were still in the game at that point.
Georgia had lots of penalties in the first half that stalled their drives, and killed their momentum in the game last week vs. the gators. Matt Stafford had how many turnovers last week?
Bottom line is: Bama took it to the Dawgs in the 1st half,and played very conservative in the second half, which is typical of Nick Saban. Don't take my word for it though, ask TE, he'll tell ya how Nick Saban coaches. That's who 1st told me of his style, and he was dead on...
Nice try, though.
back
You know, the way I see it, with this system, there will never be a clear cut Champion. Take last year for example,
LSU v OSU--everyone knows OSU would not have made it through the first round of a playoff
But I think I figured out why nobody wants a play-off sytem. It's because they know that only teams from the SEC would get to compete against each other for the trophy every year. I guess we do need to let other Conferences have fun too, and let them think they are top notch. I will not say that BCS gets it wrong all the time; but I think the main problem in the whole system is if you time your losses right, you still may get a chance at the end of the season when better teams are out there. Sad really
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/9999161/
Gigem-Aggies
Go Cowboys
Unfortunately the better team doesn't always win...
As displayed last Saturday night in Lubbock...
If so, may I suggest OU just phoning in their game against the Dread Pirates...
Since the Sooners already lost to Texas at home Tech must obviously be better than OU...
So why even have them waste the gas...
Right?
The better team can lose any day to a team that plays better...
Especially when dealing with 18-22 year olds...
Examples:
Florida / Mississippi 2008
W Va / E Car 2008
Michigan / Appy State 2007
Alabama / LA Monroe 2007
SoCal / Stanford 2007
FSU / NC St 1998
Wisco / Cincy 1999
FSU / So Miss 1989
Oklahoma / Kansas 1975
Do I need to keep going?
[pats the Red Raiders on the back]
Good job, boys...
Better?
I think you got it now...
;-]
So, there has never been an "upset" in college football, right? The best team always wins. So, when Boise State beat Oklahoma, and Oregon beat Oklahoma - the best team won those games. Do you realize that Oklahoma lost three games in 07'. That's right - three of them. Now, maybe West Virginia was better. But, by the end of last year, nobody looked better than Oklahoma did. Did that mean that the other two games that they lost, that the two teams that they lost to, were better than Oklahoma? Or, how about the two games that LSU lost in 07'? Do you really think that Kentucky and Arkansas were both better than LSU was? If so, why weren't Kentucky and Arkansas playin' for all the marbles?
You get no argument from me there...
Gigem-Aggies
OU beats Texas Texas beats A&M A&M beats OU A&M conf Champ
Texas beats KSU OU beats Texas KSU beats OU KSU conf Champ
Texas beats OU Texas beats Neb KSU beats Texas Neb vs OU Champ game
This years south is plum crazy BTW both A&M & BU are improving and could pull an upset- dont count anybody out yet- You cant worry about what you cant control just take care of business everyday and do your best
The season is far from over and dont forget Texas has a trip to Lawrence to face a good KU team
Then I woke up.
About the TCU-Oklahoma question, you are almost right. Oklahoma only picks up 8 wins from TCU as TCU played down for one of their wins. The point is that TCU is one of the top teams in a weaker FBS conference. Beating TCU obviously means more than beating San Diego State(1 FBS win) or some Div 1 FCS team. By comparison, the week before that Texas Tech was beating up on Massachusetts, a Div 1 FCS team. Oklahoma should receive more credit for their win that week as their opponent was definitely tougher than Tech's.
Taken as a whole, Win Factor is an easy way to balance out the conferences without the use of subjective polls or complex statistics.
Ball State's Win Factor is 14 which is good for only 41st place in national rankings. Central Michigan is actually higher in the Win Factor rankings at 17. CM lost to Georgia and Purdue. WinFactor correctly positions these teams based on performance on the field and not the perfect record. They play each other on Nov 19 to see who will be the class of the MAC. Either way, neither of these teams should even be in the Top 25 based on who they've beaten.
Boise State and Utah fare better with matching Win Factors of 26. This puts them in the top 10 for now but there aren't enough wins in either teams remaining schedule to keep them there even if they win out. These teams are good but their conferences haven't racked up enough non-conference victories to carry them very high in the end.
Again, Win Factor doesn't care about your perfect record against less-than-stellar opponents. Wins over winning teams are what count.
My bad. You need to cheer for Tech. You need the three way tie to have a shot. Now I get it.
The win improves their Win Factor to 19 temporarily moving them to 21st in the national standings. Remember most of the teams above them in Win Factor haven't even played yet this week. By Sunday, Ball State will probably be 15th in the BCS. At the same time they will probably slide back down in the 40's based on their Win Factor.
MAC fans will whine about how the BCS formula is keeping them out of the Top 10. I would argue that the BCS formula (the polls mostly) is actually giving them a boost.
Other than the MAC fans out there, does anybody really believe Ball State belongs in between LSU and Michigan State?????
TCU (8 Wins, Winfactor 24) vs Utah (8 Wins, Winfactor 26)
Texas Tech (7 Wins, Winfactor 28) vs OSU (7 Wins, Winfactor 20)
By the way, before you whine about the win counts above, remember that those are FBS wins. Wins against lower division teams count for "NADA" in Win Factor.
Also, Texas still leads the country with a Win Factor of 37 but the three games remaining to them(Baylor, A&M, Kansas) won't let them pull away from Tech and Oklahoma. If either Tech or Oklahoma wins out, they should pass Texas on the way to the Big 12 championship.