-
Website
http://www.fanblogs.com/ -
Original page
http://www.fanblogs.com/clemson/007715.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Tom_Blogical
937 comments · 13 points
-
TigerEducated
1588 comments · 36 points
-
"BC"
747 comments · 29 points
-
TampaGator
901 comments · 55 points
-
Ramblin' Gator
1029 comments · 50 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Fanblogs Open Conference Championship Thread
2 days ago · 137 comments
-
Weis Out at Notre Dame
4 days ago · 114 comments
-
Week Thirteen College Football Polls
5 days ago · 53 comments
-
Fanblogs Turkey Day/Thanksblogging Thread
1 week ago · 76 comments
-
Alabama and Auburn Through The Decades
1 week ago · 70 comments
-
Fanblogs Open Conference Championship Thread
We'll see how the rest of the season goes. If it holds true to form changes will need to be made. If they aren't made, then the AD will probably get to answer for it with his job. There are a lot of very angry Clemson fans/alums/boosters right now.
When this happens, you don't run the ball as much.
Also, these stats don't represent Spiller's increased use in the slot, etc.
HOWEVER - all in all, yeah. You've got Davis and Spiller. Use them....
We've all seen plenty of games where a "running team" falls behind early, pounds the ball, and wins against a battered defense.
You get millions a year, a $4 million buyout and you only have to win 8 games a year.
....and you never get fired!
http://www.al.com/sports/birminghamnews/index.s...
Man, Alabama's nose tackle Cody is so big, his gravitational pull was sucking in Clemson's RBs. He's so big, he's got other big linemen orbiting him.
Clemson should make a run for Spurrier.
I would love a new coach though. Any other recommendations?
2. Greg Schiano from Rutgers
3. Steve Spurrier, best college coach out there
4. Jim Leavitt from USF (would be my choice for Clemson)
5. Rich Brooks from Kentuck
6. Brian Kelley of Cincy
Chow has a high profile job in LA and doesn't sport the charisma for a head coaching job, IMO...
Spurrier will be at SoCar until he retires or is run off by a fickle fan base...
Leavitt would not be too smart to leave such a fertile recruiting base that he is just starting to gain credibility in and challenge the other "Big" schools in FL...
Brooks has already structured an exit plan for retiring and named his future replacement in Phillips...
However, I'll add a few names to the pile:
Charlie Strong (DC @ Florida): This guys has gotten a bunch of looks for HC jobs over the last few years (I would hate to see him go though)...
Jimbo Fisher - I know he's seemingly locked in by his buyout but somebody will pay it if they want him bad enough...
Chris Peterson - Look what he's done at Boise to maintain the level of play that rose under Hawkins...
Skip Holtz - If ECU has a 1-2 loss season, Granny Jr. will be on a LOT of school's candidate list...
Leavitt and USF cannot compete with Florida, FSU and Miami in recruiting. Last year was an odd year with all the major schools losing games to subpar teams. I doubt USF will have better than a 3 loss season in a weak Big East Conference. He would get outstanding recruits at Clemson vs USF.
Apparently you're uninformed on Strong given that he's largely ben considered one of the top candidates for a HC position for some time now...
Schools that have requested or contacted Strong for interviews just this past season include Arkansas, GT, & Ole Miss and include Minnesota, Cincy, Vandy, Cal-Berkley, Louisville (both before they hired Petrino and after Petrino left) among other D-1 directional schools and lower divisional ones as well in prior seasons...
And what since 2006 has he shown?
Only that he could take a defense returning only TWO starters and simply ONE senior and coach it into leading the SEC in rushing defense last season...
While at first glance against an admittedly highly inferior opponent in Week One of 2008 season, appears to have vastly improved and developed the weakest part of his 2007 defense; the secondary...
Among his general credentials...
Over 25 years coaching experience...
Has coached under Meyer, Holtz and Spurrier winning championships with nationally ranked teams and developing NFL first rounders and eventual all-pros...
Considered one of the top 25 recruiters in the nation with a developed reputation in Florida among many top prep programs...
His rock solid character, love of family, strong community involvement anchor his personal life and his love of academics (Two master's degrees and a Specialist degree) provides an example to his players that is perhaps unmatched by ANY coach in the nation whether the HC or GA...
So now that I've put out there why he's qualified IMO...
Why would you say he's not???
As far as Leavitt is concerned...
Yes, in the immediacy of today Clemson would provide an attractive ability to jump up in recruiting rankings...
However...
Leavitt possibly has the ability to stick it out at USF and develop them into an "FSU- Lite" if he stays for the long haul...
Remember that FSU didn't really start dominating recruiting until nearly ten years into Bobby's tenure...
If Leavitt remains there (which I think he will until retirement, JMHO), he'll be able to slowly chip away and continue to raise his program's profile in state and get a little better each year in the recruiting end...
Which he has done over the last ten years a little at a time...
So again...
Yes, in the immediate future he could have better recruiting at Clemson but in the long haul Leavitt can easily attain a top 15 class within a few years if he can maintain the forward momentum he has built in Tampa...
So that's your argument???
Because your in-laws think his play calling is crap???
Good god...
Discussion over...
-Auburn beating you at home on a last minute drive
-Georgia piling up 41 points on your "AWESOME" defense
-Chad Henne, Mario Manningham and Adrian Arrington using your secondary like a Elliot Spitzer's women.
Not playcalling...
Derrick Harvey, Major Wright, Dustin Doe, Spikes...
You had a capable defense to get you back into the SEC championship game and the BCS championship. Strong never adapted his play calling. The "bend but dont break" scheme NEVER works.
I'm not questioning his character, just his play calling.
You're pointing too one returning starter, a kid that was playing prep ball at that time the year before and two other cats that were redshirts and mostly played in mop up duty the season before as a "capable" defense...
Throw in another true freshman at one corner and a redshirt sophmore that mostly saw time on Special Teams in 2006 along with factoring in the decimation of an already thin DL by injuries...
Any Gator fan that expected a return trip to the SEC CG a given in 2007 is a seriously delusional fan and blinded by their inability to assess their favorite team objectively...
Being the realist that I am I pointed out before the 2007 season even began right here at Fanblogs that UF would be a 3-4 loss team at best and had no business in the top ten all season long BECAUSE of their inexperienced defense...
And remind me again how that prediction turned out???
I would suggest not taking betting advice from your "Orange and Blue" blue koolaid drinking in laws if you're a gambling man...
FYI - Strong actually has been lauded for his aggressive attacking defensive schemes...
Not a "Bend but don't break" mentality...
I'm afraid he's right: "...Derrick Harvey, Major Wright, Dustin Doe, Spikes... " would make for very solid defensive foundation...
...in the BIG 10!
(You gotta' take into account the perspective where the comment's coming from; Marko's just trying to play up their Bowl win...never mind the NC aspirations going into season, and NFL talent on Michigan...).
I jest, of course-- 100% in agreement with your analysis here re. Strong.
GO GATORS!!
You've just again showed that you nothing of Charlie Strong...
Strong has been a fixture at Florida off and on for over 20 years...
His latest stint began again in 2003 when he was hired by Zook to improve the defense as the DC and bolster recruiting (again a known "Strong" point for Charlie)...
After which he was designated as the Interim HC for the Peach Bowl loss after Zook was canned and had to deal with a supporting staff that decidedly didn't want to be there as the Gators prepared for that game as Zook's staffers that were heading to Illinois with him all wore Illini shirts in the practices leading up to that game purposely instigating a lowering of team morale...
Then took the defensive talent (much of which he directly recruited) and further developed it into the championship quality that we saw in 2006...
Then last season, Charlie took a decidely inexperienced defense and STILL led the league in rushing defense despite the reasons I outlined above...
IMO sounds like there isn't a need to wait and see what Strong can do...
The "wait and see" is more in when will prominent white boosters see past the race issue and give Strong his chance that is long overdue...
So let me get this straight...
You're saying that Strong is NOT qualified for a HC position because:
A) Your In-Laws don't like his play calling...
B) The UF defense gave up 40+ points twice last season...
IS that right?
You have more of a reason than that, right???
(1) Charlie Strong's defense has had poor performances and nothing to show since 2006 (I guess that means one year, 2007, or did the Gators need a few more pic6's against Hawaii to avoid a poor performance in game one this year?)
(2) play calling is, in his opinion, crap. In the absence of his resume, his credentials, or some example of play calls that were crap to demonstrate the value of this opinion, it is hard to put a value on such an argument. I guess I would call it an opinion from an unknown quantity.
(3) his inlaws. Interestingly, the way he phrases it , "EVEN" his inlaws know [Charlie Strong] needs to be replaced, implies that they are anything but knowledgeable about football. In addition to limiting the value of the argument by its own terms, it also succeeds in making him candidate for "condescending son in law of the year." Since his opinion is that his inlaws know very little about football, then why should this be an argument?
(4) A last minute scoring drive given up to Auburn. The horror. I don't think I have ever seen a good team lose a game. Presumably it would have been better if UF had lost in a blowout, rather than narrowly losing a close game.
(5) UGA scored 41 points. ( Sorry, I havent been able to say that often, but it feels good. I have to give him that one)
(6) The Michigan game
(7) bend don't break philosphy (is that not just a recasting of the opinion that there was poor play calling?)
(8) poor results occured despite a wealth of named, talented players
(9) poor performance in big games (restates UGA and the bowl game, each of which are restatements of the "performance since 2006" argument)
In sum, he has three points, ranked in order of value:
inlaws
2007 was not a great season
opinion of unknown blogger
I think he wins by a nose on the basis of his willingness to insult the inlaws.
GO GATORS!!
Giving the ball to these two guys only makes sense if they can make it past the line of scrimmage. They're not magic. Handing them the ball more times for TFLs isn't going to win you any ballgames.
At least in the Alabama game, they lost because their lines got dominated on both sides of the ball. Calling more run plays would not have made that any better. In fact, it'd have just made it worse. I suspect that was probably the case in the other games you point out as well.
Remember there is another way to get the ball into the hands of either...
I think the focus MUST be on touches per game for these playmakers...
Getting both on the field at the same time with one lining up on the perimeter would have opened up ALOT for Clemson last weekend...
JMHO...
no coach will have a gameplan for clemson that is as effective as Saban's was.
i think its pretty smart.
now i dont think Bowden that good of a coach, but i think Clemson can still easily win the ACC if they get it together.
Alabama is a good team. right now they look like a top 3 team in the SEC. which is damn good.
CJ Spiller and James Davis is still the best HB duo in the U.S.
If you fire Bowden, unless you get a first-class, five-star coach, you're gonna have a significant drop-off. Bowden made your team relevant. nobody else could get that talent to come to Clemson.
Why?
Does Saban have a patent and copyright on his gameplan for Clemson???
Or do you just think no other coach could actually watch the game film and mimic the Tide's plan vs. the Tigers?
He mentioned the word "effective". I seriously doubt that any team that Clemson is gonna play, sans South Carolina, is gonna be able to have the team speed to shut down those running lanes the way that Bama did. I got your point - and you are correct. Once a team shows that they cannot counter something - then other coaching staffs are going to try and ride that until you prove otherwise. Fact is: that same game plan may absolutely backfire, unless the overall team speed of that defense, can effectively execute that game plan the same way that Alabama did. Remember, Spiller and Davis only need a blink of the eye to be long gone. They did not get that blink against Bama. And, they may not get it against South Carolina either. But, I think they'll do fine in the ACC.
However...
I'd throw FSU in there as comparable in team speed (W over Bama last season)...
Noles are down but it's because of inconsistency on offense...
Wake will match up nicely, but that game will more than likely become a shootout/last possession ball game...
Nice to see you back around...
Alabama's D-line clogged up the running lanes and got pressure with only the front four. That allowed Bama's linebackers to fall back deeper into coverage since they didn't have to blitz or even respect the run.
And the Tide's O-line blew open huge holes and provided great pass protection.
Yes, brute force was also a major factor. Clearly the Bama D-Line was more physically strong. But, keep in mind - they shut that passing attack down also. They had at least two guys in the QB's face on just about every single pass play. That was the speed part. There are tons of very strong people on those lines in college football - but getting to "your spot" on time is what it is all about. Bama was able to use both speed and power to completely dominate Clemson's offense - they had no chance. I know how this kinda defense works. I watch it every single Saturday
i dont think that another coach in football could watch the Alabama/Clemson game and copy Saban's gameplan.
no way no how.
thats absolutely impossible. and illegal, because Saban actually did get a patent on his game plan.
i dont think any coach in america has TiVo.
Don't forget that Bobby Bowden has figured out the "interwebs" and all that "e-bay stuff"...
Saban: Well Tommy, I'm not sure why you would ask me for advice since we're competitors. Maybe you can do that with your daddy, but it's the job of Mark Richt, Frank Beamer and I to beat you, not to help you beat us. But I'll give you a hint just this once. I simply went to FanBlogs and TigerNet and RF365 and read what the disgruntled Clemson fans have been saying about Clemson's perennial weakness during your tenure. And then we took advantage of it. It saved us many hours of watching film. I'd recommend either watching the game film of your losses (not your cupcake wins) or if you're incapable of recognizing your problems, perhaps you could consult with the blogosphere since the Clemson fans seem to have your MO nailed. Well, Nice talking to you. Unlike some people, I gotta go earn my salary.
Coach A calls coach B for advice on how to get the boot Coach B buried in Coach A's ass, out of Coach A's ass....
Humble and shameless...so close, yet so far.
GO GATORS!!
Honestly, if he keeps this up, I wouldn't mind having Coach Johnson back in Clemson orange. He's doing a lot with so little and he seems to really motivate his guys to play hard for him. #31 looked like he could've run right through a brick wall tonight. Motivation and going the extra mile is something that Clemson could really use these days.
I also like his attitude and support of the decision by Vandy Admin. to dump their Athletic Department and seriously seek true student athletes...
On that note alone, Johnson would be a huge plus for Clemson which is so highly for it's academics...
Maybe you can answer a question for me, CJ...
Was Johnson on the list in 98/99 when the search process that resulted in Bowden's hire at Clemson?
He had really brought Furman full circle at that point so I'm just curious if had received consideration...
I really like Johnson though. It would be a bit of a gamble, but I love that strong defensive mentality.
GO GATORS!!
He is done. This will probably be the final nail in the coffin. He may be a really nice guy, but knowing how to motivate your players after a loss is not something you call and ask the person who kicked your ass. Bad move