<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Fanblogs.com - Latest Comments in Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://fanblogs.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://fanblogs.disqus.com/cha_ching_top_10_football_revenue_schools/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:46:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-13341823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can probably move a couple more SEC teams onto the top ten this year....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thestate.com/gogamecocks/story/869551.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thestate.com/gogamecocks/story/869551.html"&gt;http://www.thestate.com/gog...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">U.of S.C.1978</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-13119472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another thing, aren't their more teams?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.answerblip.com/big-east-college-football" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.answerblip.com/big-east-college-football"&gt;http://www.answerblip.com/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bigeastfootballtrivia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:34:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-13119437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those are some crazy numbers. I think they have to be overstated. Where did these numbers come from?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bigeastfootballtrivia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:33:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11457603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Longhorn baseball draws 10k per game...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Basketball averages 16k per game&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even their swimming &amp;amp; diving teams draw good crowds&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fosterkeats</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:39:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11132714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's just become so cliche' to gloat over another school going on probation, I thought you were better than that...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If it comes out tomorrow that Les Miles paid for hookers &amp;amp; booze for his players, I wouldn't spend my time "stickin" it to another school, I couldn't care less, I care about other things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fosterkeats</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:12:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11061221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe it was your school &amp;amp; its Student Athletes, Boosters, &amp;amp; Coaches who put itself in that "place" you're talking about...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not us...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't give us easy targets...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...and you are right about one thing with the Yawn...It's almost as if Bama's on probation so much for violations that its something &lt;i&gt;even its fans&lt;/i&gt; take for granted...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-TE-</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:57:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11059406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This link shows the rest of the Big 12 TC, Texas must be part of the Mafia...;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huskerlocker.com/blogs/view/bid/1374/i/the_troubling_gap_between_texasand_everyone_else/o/1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.huskerlocker.com/blogs/view/bid/1374/i/the_troubling_gap_between_texasand_everyone_else/o/1"&gt;http://www.huskerlocker.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OU_Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:12:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11053218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a nice bit of change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I thought State Pen would have been higher....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PittsburghTiger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:45:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11051803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hahaahhahahahahahaha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cobia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11051465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No Big East schools are on the list wow.......&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">4cornerz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:08:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11049731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ask BC. He claims to pull a lot of wool. Don't know what that really means...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">War_Eagle_Atlanta</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11049694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, we're at Office Depot making copies of the chip so everybody can have one...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yea, you're right. That's pretty weak. Let me work on a top 10 list...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">War_Eagle_Atlanta</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11047105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Alabama would be waaay ahead of Auburn if they weren't paying twice the market price for the 'general manager'..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Actually, Alabama would be waaay ahead of Auburn if they weren't paying their players..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WOW!!! Talk about zingers!!! How do I go on now that you have totally put my school in its place. I may have to change my favorite team b/c CLEARLY, you all have told it like it is, shown us all the light...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;YAWN...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please take a trip down to Home Depot and get that CHIP OFF YOUR SHOULDER...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fosterkeats</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:31:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11032850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I got yo' back, brother...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">War_Eagle_Atlanta</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:57:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11027221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Must be the wool.....gets cold in Oklahoma&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OU_Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:53:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11024672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's because Zac got the Chemistry MB instead, along with Atomic Energy.  I leave the finance &amp;amp; definitions there-of to the bean counters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BASTAGES ALLA YUZ!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:24:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11016597</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Thanks for the link- a little dated, but probably hasn't changed much&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1Tomcat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:00:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11015985</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Washers &amp;amp; Darts have overtaked Horseshoes, Frisbee golf and canoe races are becoming more popular than turkey shoots and chicken fights- heck the times are a changin- non competitive intertube floating&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1Tomcat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:40:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11014658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've never seen any figures on how many FBS teams lose money on football. I would guess that it's not many. In the lower divisions, it would be more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The rule of thumb has always been that basketball pays for itself. Football pays for itself AND everything else.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">War_Eagle_Atlanta</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11014058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I apologize for the repetitive info.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if there is any data on the Div. 1 CFB programs that create the largest financial deficits due to their operation.  I know many programs actually lose tons and tons of money each year just keeping the program operating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:41:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11011102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sheep futures up BIG TIME on this news yesterday!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">War_Eagle_Atlanta</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:30:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11011091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We did a thread on that when it came out. The article analyzed programs as if they were businesses, measuring not only revenue, but profitability. Forbes does a similar analysis on 5 major pro sports franchises and assigns a market value. Wish they'd update the one on CFB. Although they are not as profitable as professional sports, there is no doubt that college football is BIG business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Which makes me wonder why a lot of big name programs continue to let homers and lackeys run the show...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">War_Eagle_Atlanta</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-11010673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Surprises me too about Okie State, livestock must be more valuable than I thought..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OU_Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-10998169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, Alabama would be waaay ahead of Auburn if they weren't paying &lt;i&gt;their players&lt;/i&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They would like to note that thanks to GM &amp;amp; Chrysler's demise, the cost of Chargers has gone down in Gadsden City, as well as elsewhere across the State of Alabama. So, the margin hit they're taking on that one is somewhat lessened by the incentives &amp;amp; overall depressed pricing in the automotive sector. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-TE-</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:27:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cha-ching: Top 10 football revenue schools</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008129.php#comment-10995491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure you will find this interesting for this who want some more raw numbers.  A bit outdated but I'm sure the numbers are fairly constant over the years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surprises (imo): South Carolina, Michigan State, Wisconsin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Forbes.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Forbes.com"&gt;Forbes.com&lt;/a&gt;: The Most Valuable College Football Teams (11.20.2007)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/11/20/notre-dame-fooball-biz-sports-cx_ps_1120collegeball.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.forbes.com/2007/11/20/notre-dame-fooball-biz-sports-cx_ps_1120collegeball.html"&gt;http://www.forbes.com/2007/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:20:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>