Fanblogs.com - Latest Comments in Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

TampaGator — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:21:27 -0000

Zac:

No, I meant "made man"---it was a "mafioso" reference, I thought you of all posters, would've picked up on that--b/t/w, if you find that offensive, my apologies--let me know, I'll refrain from similar refrences in the future. (Bobby Bowden of course, being the other "made man").

I agree with you that Monte as HC with Lane as CIW, would be preferable, but Monte has repeatedly proclaimed his disinterest in HC position (tried to word that a proactively as possible, if your wondering about the wording). So I don't think that's a realistic option.

...and I absolutely agree about the transition--the only reason Monte considers this move, is to help his son out.

b/t/w: remeber his name came up for Nebraska job? He shot that one down without hesitation, and he had strong ties to Nebraska. Prestige and money wouldn't take him away from Tampa...

....family is a whole different deal though...

GO GATORS!!

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

Zac — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:18:12 -0000

By the way, TG, you referred to Lane KiffIn (above) as, " Another son of a "made man"." As you were referring to Lane's dad, Monte, I think you meant to say, "self-made man". This guy has worked his way up through the ranks. While he may have had some help along the way (Who doesn't?), I'd have to say he's paid his dues.

If Clemson went with the Kiffin duo, I'd take them as Monte - HC, and Lane -AHC/Recruiting Coordinator. Monte retires in 3-5 years, and son (another coach-in-waiting) takes over. Given the predominant success pattern of NFL coaches transitioning to college, I'm not certain I'd make this move at all, were it available. JMO.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

Zac — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:10:50 -0000

1 - Clemson won't be able to pull Rodriguez from his "once-in-a-lifetime" job.

2 - I can see Lane Kiffin as Recruiting Coordinator, and his dad as HC, but not the other way around.

3 - I don't know enough about Swinney to weigh in, except that for all intense and purposes, he's just a kid (comparatively speaking).

Bud Foster, provided he's actually willing to leave VA Tech, without a doubt, is Clemson's best bet right now; so long as he picks the right DC & OC and leaves said respective positions in the hands of each; not micromanage (especially the defense). JMO.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

WarEagleFan — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:58:52 -0000

I was hoping for Gober or Gomer!

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

OU_Ron — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:22:38 -0000

Roy Rogers, Happy Trails. , no more fence post's

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

aVoiceInSC — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:42:16 -0000

Good points. However Clemson usually hangs pretty well with the SEC in recruiting. Wasn't it this past year that Miami was #1 and we were #2? I could be wrong though. Anyway, usually we end up going head to head with SEC schools for our bigger recruits and we win some of them. Although, that was with the previous staff, so we'll see how the next one handles it. I would think that it would be very possible for the next coach to continue on this year's staff's successes on the recruiting trail.

Anyway, it's been said, albeit by an agent of a lot of coaches, that coaching at Clemson would be like coaching at an SEC school without having the play in the SEC. The fan base is there, the money is there, and the tradition is there, but you actually get a weaker schedule. However, with the ACC looking like it is improving as a whole, that might not even be so true here in the next couple of years. Only time will tell.

Who knows. I just want to get a coach that's going to be a good one and who will stay for a while.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

USC1801 — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:50:40 -0000

I don't know if that assessment takes into account the fact the ACC is improving in football. And as it improves, so does the chances we'll see an ACC team as the NC in the next 5 years.

If as ClemsonJoe has said, Clemson is willing to pay 3 million per year, it might be enough to lure a coach away from the competitive SEC. Consider, too, that all they have to do is win the ACC conference, and the sweet smell of success will surround them, which will equal more money and the opportunity to build a "dynasty" in their conference.

I guess what I'm saying is that it would be an easier road with much of the same benefits as the SEC. But I totally agree with you, the SEC is the better football conference, and the history and recruiting advantage are still factors to consider.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

Tommy_Trojan — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:41:14 -0000

I'm not so sure. I don't see any conflict with "pops" workin' for Lane. Lane seems to have a great young mind. Pete Carroll hired him to coach the QB's and to run the offense. He worked hand in hand with Norm Chow. His pedigree is most excellent. There really isn't a better one. Monte is one of the best at what he does.

There is the Tennessee job after all. We're all not really sure about Auburn either. Either one of those two positions would be way more "challenging" than the Clemson positions. Those two opportunities don't come along very often. I'm not saying that Auburn would consider something, but that if they were going to, then now would be the time. All of these coaches and AD's are always involved with each other. A head coaching position in the SEC would be something that the Kiffen's might be more interested in. Remember, that USC loves to recruit the Southern states, and is making great inroads there. Lane Kiffen would share many of the fundamental strategies of Pete Carroll where it comes to recruiting - and he is very good at it. I would guess that he would prefer to have an elite SEC school to use as a recruiting base if given the opportunity. I'm just saying that it would not be his 1st choice to go to Clemson.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

GeauxTigers0107 — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:54:28 -0000

Mine is Sanford and Son's theme song. I loved ole Redd Foxx.

Back on topic....again.
Yeah he is younger than us man. I think he'd be an excellent selection for Clemson though. The fact that he was in a lose-lose situation in Oakland was no surprise though. Al Davis is too eccentric for that place to have success.

I read the point below about them wanting his dad Monte to be part of the deal. I guess if you're gonna dream, dream big. I just don't see him giving up an NFL job that he's highly successful in to come work for Jr. Stanger things have happened though.

Geaux Tigers
Geaux SEC

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

War_Eagle_Atlanta — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:45:16 -0000

Nah, my ringtone is Hawaii 5-0.

I, like you, was a child of the 70s...

Bet yours is Hold that Tiger...

:-)

Back on topic: Lane Kiffin!!!! He's younger than us...

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

GeauxTigers0107 — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:39:16 -0000

LOL...

Greg, just reassure me that it's not your ringtone man. That would take the cake!

Geaux Tigers
Geaux SEC

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

War_Eagle_Atlanta — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:34:09 -0000

If you knew me in person, Bo, you'd know that's one of my favorite sound effects...

That and the buzzer from Family Feud...

XXX!!!!

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

GeauxTigers0107 — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:30:40 -0000

LMAO!!! How the hell do you come up with this crap man...lol. Forever the opportunist, I tell ya.

Geaux Tigers
Geaux SEC

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

War_Eagle_Atlanta — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:39:07 -0000

(audio listen)

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

The_Observer — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:47:20 -0000

What angle? I didn't write the article.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

Kevin @ Fanblogs — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:48:17 -0000

Game over, Lennie.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

Kevin @ Fanblogs — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:44:13 -0000

Gentlemen & Ladies -- Lane Kiffen to Clemson or nada. On topic, please.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

War_Eagle_Atlanta — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:25:51 -0000

Every Andy needs his Barney. Or in your case, Barner'y...

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

War_Eagle_Atlanta — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:25:00 -0000

There it is. That girl is adorable, how she's giggling through every minute of it. Good stuff! The comments were pretty innane, coming from a bunch of folks all liquored up...

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

The_Observer — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:10:45 -0000

I suppose they could be fabricating it about their own fan base.

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

WarEagleFan — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:09:27 -0000

Thanks Andy

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

War_Eagle_Atlanta — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:08:10 -0000

I'm the new sheriff in town...

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

TampaGator — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:01:51 -0000

Bin fun chief...but life beckons...last word's all yours, big guy.

GO GATORS!!

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

WarEagleFan — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:59:18 -0000

Hey how did you get that star by your name?\

Re: Clemson interviews Lane Kiffen

Lennie Collins — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:59:06 -0000

You don't have to re-post it. Cause you are not! You are posting in circles so move on! If you would have called me out....BAMM, it would have been posted.