<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Fanblogs.com - Latest Comments in Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://fanblogs.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://fanblogs.disqus.com/recruiting_violations_on_facebook/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:09:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-9347082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;NCAA allows coachess from NCSU to recruit on youtube webpage. What is the difference, because the student was on facebook? Give me a break!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXBrJ9oiJ2Q" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXBrJ9oiJ2Q"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jwallfan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:09:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8933906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think he is talking about the habit of some to post pithy comments with a link to a product of a firm they are attempting to market...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Prather</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:34:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8932080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm...  You say "...this needs to stop."  What, specifically?  Are you referring to the alleged recruiting violations, as discussed in the article above?  Could it be recruiting violations in general?  Are you referring to the over-all abuse of the internet via tools such as U-Tube or Facebook?  How do you feel about coaches e-mailing or texting prospective recruits and their families?  OR, is it the overbearing authority imposed upon collegiate sports (especially upon college football) by the NCAA?  Maybe it's this blog?  Maybe it's all these questions?  So, "what" needs to stop?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:27:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8931361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All I can say is that this needs to stop.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**edited - no commercial links, please**&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jold</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 11:48:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8548580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You got my vote for "Blogger Of The Month"!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8546041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're right, Ron..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hrposon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8489132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You've been on a roll lately...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-TE-</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:46:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8485532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are other "recruiting" violations on Facebook that are more important to look out for... they usually involve 13yr old girls and pederasts...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fosterkeats</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8484601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Franchione is kicking himself for not strip-mining that revenue stream while at A&amp;amp;M...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-TE-</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8484331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He probably got his law degree from Tulane...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[For Tampa Gator]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-TE-</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8481994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're wrong...........LSU has nothing to do with it..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OU_Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:27:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8481164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would think CFB coaches Twitter feeds would be more of a concern than FB... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gatorhippy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:09:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8477617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would love to see every school pull out of the NCAA.  They constantly overstep their boundaries.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BamaBorn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8477568</link><description>&lt;p&gt; TE - Don't forget that the mothers get the AP loaner for life Mercedes Benz. If the moms agree to bad mouth LSU or Texas they throw in a Crimson and Cream SUV for the rest of the family.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hrposon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:21:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8471782</link><description>&lt;p&gt;NCAA spokesman, Erik Christianson:  "We don't see it as a free-speech issue. What we do see it as is a recruiting issue...We want to be sure that we limit that level of intrusion that comes into their lives."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a US Supreme Court decision waiting to happen.  Fans are all over the place.  They're getting the inside scoops and posting them on U-Tube, via e-mails; they're texting on cell phones and lap-tops.  How can an educated man see this as really being all that different; not to mention, being all that much influential to a school's prospective recruit.  It stands to reason, for as many drawn to a school through such efforts, there will be as many driven away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly this Christianson character either knows nothing of the law, or got his law degree from a cereal box.  (Just one more reason NOT to like the NCAA - They don't want to regulate.  They want to RULE!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CJ, you've got it in 1.  That which can do good can also be abused.  In fact, someone has already done something similar.  I think it happened in the Big 12.  OU Ron, wasn't OK the recipient of another's deceit?  Didn't K-Hue post a thread to that effect, or did we briefly discuss it on an open thread?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8463054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed - this is completely unrealistic.  In the computing business, we would call this a solution that is not scalable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ramblin' Gator</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8460968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It'd be one thing to perhaps ATTEMPT to monitor a student doing it on campus...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's another to attempt to do to everyone whom the NCAA considers a Booster...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any Season Ticket Holder...Any member of a group like our Gridiron Club or Tiger Athletic Foundation here at LSU, like myself, or otherwise...It's dizzying trying to keep up with it as an individual...Much less the amount of Compliance Personnel you'd have to hire to monitor your ENTIRE FANBASE &amp;amp; the ENTIRE INTERNET...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-TE-</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:58:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8460883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ron, I like you, man...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[Please...no Bromance jokes, guys]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">-TE-</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8460717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In addition to free speech and the other issues mentioned already, I have to object to the NCAA's stance here just on pragmatic grounds.  Does the NCAA really expect its member institutions to police the entire internet to assure that no one is making any positive inferences about that institution and one of its recruits?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ramblin' Gator</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8457473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Watching &lt;i&gt;60 Minutes&lt;/i&gt; last night, it appears Utah is still trying to shed the "cold fusion fiasco" 20 years later.  Perhaps facebook "bombing" other research institutions could help?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ramblin' Gator</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8446874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Both of those comments are too funny!  Glad you can poke fun at yourself!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wardboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:11:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8444770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;# 2 on my list is Guaranteed Big 12 Championship........without an *&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OU_Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:05:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8440057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The NCAA has overstepped on this one.  What constitutes "influence" in their minds will have to be weighed against the greater import of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But even harder to determine will be the motives of those creating the pages.   For example, what if I, a USC fan, were to post a similar such page but pose as a Clemson fan?  Would I be able to have Clemson placed on probation? (let the hacking begin!)  If, as the NCAA asserts by flexing its muscles, the web pages really do have an "illegal" influence on a players choice, then I'm sure someone will try to negatively impact another university to the benefit of their own school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bottom line:  The NCAA is just blowing smoke IMO.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">USC1801</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:52:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8430110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is absolutely ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, say, if Trent Richardson were to be my friend on Facebook during NSD, could I have gotten in trouble for my status saying "Come on Trent, put on the crimson!" right before he made his choice? Obviously not, because that would CLEARLY be protected by the 1st. But a fan page? Really?? Definitely not affecting recruits decisions, unless the page was created by someone wealthy and promised the recruit something in return...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bama_Babe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:22:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recruiting violations on Facebook? </title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/008083.php#comment-8429218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, but most people get tongue tied trying to say that, so we just refer to it by saying " RBSSS&amp;amp;DE " &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OU_Ron</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:19:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>