-
Website
http://www.fanblogs.com/ -
Original page
http://www.fanblogs.com/sec/007831.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Tom_Blogical
937 comments · 13 points
-
TigerEducated
1588 comments · 36 points
-
"BC"
747 comments · 29 points
-
TampaGator
901 comments · 55 points
-
Ramblin' Gator
1029 comments · 50 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Fanblogs Open Conference Championship Thread
2 days ago · 137 comments
-
Weis Out at Notre Dame
4 days ago · 114 comments
-
Week Thirteen College Football Polls
5 days ago · 53 comments
-
Fanblogs Turkey Day/Thanksblogging Thread
1 week ago · 76 comments
-
Alabama and Auburn Through The Decades
1 week ago · 70 comments
-
Fanblogs Open Conference Championship Thread
You're acting like that's a bad thing, considering there are some that actually will go ape. Most of them around here are very reasonable, though.
"They're gonna laugh at you!"
Meh. Doesn't bother me in the least! :-)
Followed by UCG and their "butt buddies"...
The SEC has 4 strong this year, a decent middle, and a very bad bottom. Usually their bottom is much stronger than it is right now.
Computers are just as biased as the people who program them.
The middle and bottom of the SEC are not as strong as usual. The Big 12 is looking like the top conference this year. What I'd like to see is how the Big 12 Champion offense does against the SEC champion defense. Don't know if it will happen, but I can continue hoping!
Big XII is the best this year, hands down. In my opinion, 2nd place is a 3 horse race yet to be determined. The SEC has more at the top than the other 2, but not much backing them up. The Big Ten is good at the top, and decent in the middle, while the ACC is the deepest with no one currently at the top. We'll just have to see how it all shakes out.
If I had it my way, I'd like to see a BCS this year consisting of Texas vs. Florida, Alabama vs. Penn State, Southern Cal vs. Oklahoma, West Virginia vs. Utah, ACC Champ vs. Boise/Tulsa/TCU/BYU. I know I won't get my wish, but it'd be great if I did.
On the flip side, I have no idea what the best ACC victory over a non-ACC opponent would be.
We always want to prentend like losses to Duke, UCLA and Louisiana Tech don't mean anything - but they do. There were other losses to good teams like Texas, West Virginia, Wake Forest and Georgia Tech. Nevertheless, maybe some of those games could have been wins. But, the vast majority of wins have come against very inferior competition. The "signature win" has either been Alabama's beatdown of Clemson or Georgia beating Arizona State. Both USC and Oregon beat ASU but a much larger margin. Clemson has lost three other games. There is nothing in this year that suggests that the SEC rules the roost. Many of their top teams are on the decline like LSU, Arkansas and Auburn. Kentucky has had many injuries. Alabama is on the incline - as well as Mississippi. Overall, just like the PAC 10 in this year, the conference is on the decline. Bowl season is yet to come, and the SEC always does well there, so they still have a shot at retaining order. Personally, I think that the Big 12 is overrated in this year. We'll find out come Bowl season.
I'll be leaving my "detachable penis" at the crib. Sure hope my ol' lady don't go and let some other guy have it.
It's perfectly "correct". You can say that it is misleading, embellished, or whatever you may think of it, but it is accurate to the fact. :-)
OK! Just depends on what rating you want to look at. Personally, I'd never look at the ELO-Chess, as it's a load of crap. The "combined" only adds that in. But, your choice.
like every other conference DOES schedule tough OOC opponents.
i love how everyone dogs the SEC's OOC schedule, while forgetting to look at their own.
okay so OSU scheduled USC.
that was one good thing.
but at least the SEC is trying harder than anyone else.
Alabama vs. Clemson - hey at least they tried. they didnt know clemson was gonna suck so bad.
Auburn vs. WVU - challenging the top Big Easy opponent. props.
Ole Miss vs. Wake Forest - pretty gutsy as well.
Tennessee vs. UCLA - once again, UCLA was supposed to be good.
im sure there are others.
name any conference that scheduled a tougher OOC schedule than that.
As for the UCLA-Tennessee game, I think Tennessee was supposed to be good to.
How many FCS teams did the PAC 10 play? None? Maybe if the SEC had to play the MWC like the PAC 10 does they would have had a 1-6 blow to their OOC record.
You've lost your mind, son. Back away from the paint canister while there is still time. Your brain can recover - maybe.
"name any conference that scheduled a tougher OOC schedule than that". Really? How about every single conference including the Sunbelt. Here are some of the "stellar" teams that the SEC has scheduled:
Division II
Citadel, Georgia Southern, Norfolk State, Wofford, Western Illinois, Tennessee-Martin, Appalachian State, Samford and SE Louisiana.
Sunbelt Conference
Arkansas State, North Texas, Western Kentucky (2), Middle Tennessee (2) and UL Monroe (3).
Other noteworthy opponents
UA Birmingham (2), Wyoming, Tulane (2) and Louisiana Tech.
"but at least the SEC is trying harder than anyone else". What? Stop it , man, your killing me here. You have got to just quit. Your conference is a total and complete joke as far as who they schedule to play OOC.
The PAC 10 has scheduled only one Division II opponent, and I beleive, that is because Oregon had to do it. Puuuuleeeaaase! Stop with the comedy!
it's not about who schedules the most BCS OOC opponents.
it's about who schedules the toughest OOC opponents.
and dont give credit to BCS bottom-feeders for scheduling tough OOC opponents.
i'm talking about OOC games that have big programs vs. big programs
alabama played clemson - an elite ACC program
auburn played WVU - the best Big East program
Georgia played ASU - an elite Pac 10 program
Tennessee played UCLA - an elite Pac 10 program
those are the games that matter.
good programs that have the guts to face other good programs
and rivalry games don't count.
ACC
FSU
Miami
Clemson
Virginia Tech
Pac 10
USC
Oregon
Arizona St.
UCLA
Cal
Big Ten
Ohio State
Michigan
Penn State
Wisconsin
Big XII
Texas
Oklahoma
Missouri
SEC
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Tennessee
Auburn
Big East
West Virginia
South Florida
those are the eligible teams
now everyone go see how many big OOC games your conference's elite teams scheduled this year.
the SEC had 4.
ready....BREAK
You don't do the following justice:
Georgia Tech
Boston College
Illinois
Kansas
Kansas State
Colorado
Pittsburgh
Louisville
I also think the following teams outside a BCS AQ conference should count:
Notre Dame
Utah
BYU
TCU
Boise State
Fresno State
Tulsa
These teams all consistently flirt with the top 25, at least to a level consistent with Miami, FSU and Tennessee.
the ingredients?
2 parts talent, 1 part record, and 1 part SOS.
here's what i get:
1. Alabama - 10
2. Texas - 14
3. USC - 16
4. Florida - 17
5. Georgia - 18
T6. Oklahoma - 22
T6. Oklahoma State
T6. Penn State
9. Texas Tech - 28
10. Utah - 31
pretty good stuff huh?
don't you wish the BCS would use this?
mannn we'd have some good games.
imagine:
Texas v. Alabama
USC v. Florida
Georgia v. Oklahoma
Penn State v. Oklahoma State
...as the BCS games. college football heaven?
GT vs UGa
Fla vs FSU
Fla vs UM
USC vs Clem
Louis vs KY
Ole Miss vs Memphis
Texas vs Ark
These types of games are non conference games against Div-1A schools and inclusion of these games just helps your argument
What is the matter with you? Do you really think that Arizona State and UCLA are "elite" PAC 10 teams? Are you crazy? For your information - they both really suck! Now, in years past they have had some "decent" years. But, "elite" programs, no way! Is it the SEC's fault that they blow this year? No, it is not. What is sad is having to set-up games way out in the future. This creates for many games that were much anticipated - to not be very good games at all. This has happened in all four cases that you cited. Tennessee, Auburn, Clemson, Arizona State and UCLA all suck this year. Who would have thought that? I'll applaud the SEC in giving minimal effort here. But, the more telling argument is THE FACT that they scheduled twenty-four games, against very substandard competition. That is an average of two very weak OOC games per team. That will keep the losses down. Man, I mean you guys would get alot more respect, if you even scheduled "average" teams. Notice that I didn't count Troy State on the list? They are at least average. I didn't count the Southern Mississippi's or Memphis' either. But, that is about as high as you guys will go. Can't risk a loss. Gotz to continue "brainwashing" all these SEC'ers - that we are the "greatest conference". Well, Bleed, the rest of us certainly have not tasted the kool-aide.
Texas vs Arkansas 52-10
BTW WVU that challenging B-E opponent lost to Colo a team thats fighting for the bottom of B-12 north after losing to Tex,FSU and Missu
Glad the SEC fans have their own thread after hyjacking the PSU thread
Hookem
Here's to next year!!
SEC: 14 against BCS - 33 non-BCS 29.7% (I will give credit for ARK playing Tulsa a non-BCS that is currently ranked #18 in this weeks BCS)
ACC: 46.6% 21 BCS - 24 non-BCS
Big XII: 32.6% 15 BCS - 31 non-BCS (One game vs non-BCS TCU # 13 current BCS rankings)
Big 10: 29.5% 13 BCS - 31 non-BCS (Non-BCS Utah #10 current BCS rankings & Ball St #16 current BCS rankings)
Pac-10: 45.1% 14 BCS - 17 non-BCS (Non-BCS games vs Utah #10, Boise St #11, TCU #13, BYU #20 [two games], and Fresno St)
So the final ranking of who is scheduling OCC games vs other BCS schools:
ACC: 46.6%
PAC-10: 45.1%
BIG XII: 32.6%
SEC: 29.7%
BIG10: 29.5%
You can see above those who are "TRYING" and those who are not.
Here is what gets me BleedCrimson, WVU, Louisville and USF have asked every SEC team for some type of series ANYTIME in the near future. we're not even talking next year we're talking about anytime even 5-10 years down the road and the answer has been a resounding NOO! I think the BE in particular gets aggrivated with the SEC as they refuse to play us despite the relative location between the two conferences. What you all just don't like playing up north? What's the deal?
Here is an interesting note. Even though the two conferences share borders/ states together the games between them are very rare. this is the total OOC games between the two conferences since the realignment.
WVU-Auburn (home-home)
WVU-Miss St. (home-home)
S. Fl-Auburn (single AU home game)
THATS IT!
It can be noted that louisville and kentucky play every year but that is an interstate rivalry played every year.
ok so maybe it's just the teams havn't gotten on yet lets look at the BE before alignment. .......say back to 2002
Louisville's rivalry is now replaced by a short stint between Miami and Florida but take that out and who do you have??? one
2002 Syracuse against guess who?? auburn.... Props to Auburn
So in the last 6 years taking out the interstate rivalries there have been 3 organized series?!! between 94 possible matchups (96-2 instate rivalries)? really?! something seems slightly off. just a point I thought was interesting.
In case you are not aware of this: since the BCS era began in 1998, and counting games through the 2007 season, the Big East owns a 15-13 edge over the SEC in all games played. This might be the reason why your conference cannot get more games. Start rollin' over like a Division II or Sunbelt opponent - and your sure to get more games.
On a side note FSU is adopting some of the traits as their neighbors as it was announced today that they put up a verbal "hand to the face" to USF when contacted about a neutral site game. Instead they wanted to get Florida Atlantic.......apparently they want a game that is going to pack the jacksonville stadium. wait what?! Ya because that statement makes sense. I'm sure the FSU will be selling their homes for a ticket to go see....Florida Atlantic....
2009: @ FLA; @ BYU;
2010: FLA; BYU; @ Oklahoma
2011: Oklahoma; @ FLA;
2012 & 2013 We pick up WV.
As for other input regarding your post, reference other replies.
BOOMER!
Sagarin strongly favors conferences with a strong middle, throwing much less weight to the top and bottom of a conference. This will kill the MWC.
I have no idea how the SEC is not #2, or how the PAC 10 is #5.
Anderson and Hester agree with this.
Billingsleyhas the MWC over the Big East and the SEC at #2.
Massey has the Big 12, ACC and SEC in a virtual tie, and also the Big East, PAC 10 and MWC tied up, with the Big 10 in the middle.
The Colley Matrix has the MWC over the PAC 10 and the SEC at #2. This is surprisingly normal for the Colley Matrix, usually an outlier.
My personal favorite of the BCS computers is Wolfe
1 Big 12 7.162
2 Big 10 7.012
3 SEC 6.944
4 Big East 6.707
5 ACC 6.568
6 Mtn West 6.445
7 Pac 10 6.374
8 WAC 5.955
When combined you get This ranking, though slight changes since last week would be made.
The use of a Z-score can be questioned by the appearance of a bimodal distribution, with the SEC, Big 12, ACC and Big 10 at the top, the MAC, Sunbelt and C-USA at the bottom and the rest filling in the middle, though seperated more than the middle would be in a normal distribution.
Well, that whole Duke beating Vandy thing didn't help, I can tell you that much.
I must admit...t'was the biggest "WTF?" of the weekend.
Either Cutcliffe has turned a serious corner at DU, or Steve Martin was distracted, working on a movie or somesuch....
GO GATORS!!
BOOMER!
"I don't think we've seen any rankings that dispute that designation in the last four years."
Maybe for the conference but didn't Utah beat the sh%^ out of Pitt in '04?
#2 - Yes, since the entire OP is in regards to the strength of each conference, I am referring specifically to conferences. :-)
Personally, I can't argue with the rankings posted, as much as I'd like to. The bottom line is, we're just not getting it done (LSU). And like Kevin mentioned, Vandy losing to Duke does nothing to help the arguement.
Geaux Tigers
Geaux SEC
This thread will top 200 posts before midnight.
The only article is Kevin's.
What do you think Blackdawg? Do you care more about Sagarin's ranking of the SEC or the DAWGS pounding the Gators? Check out how Tebow modified his heisman statue. I am really suprised that he did not wear them to the ceremony last year. I have been waiting all year to put this one up!
GO DAWGS!!
Man, what a game Saturday. I never thought we would could get 50+ points, interception aided or otherwise. I had a few friends who went. They said that the LSU crowd was absolutely fantastic, they tailgated with a bunch of Tigers, good food and hospitality.
Looking forward to taking an eleven game lead in the GA/FL series (World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party), it would be ten games according to the enemy, (They don't count the 52-0 drubbing we gave them in 1904). Tebow aint hurtin this year is he?
Florida's speed and their ability to stretch the field, coupled with a suspect defense by Georgia (They may have been 3rd against the run, but take away our sacks, and we rushed for 200+ against them), and Florida's just too tough...
The only way the Dawgs can hunker down and keep it close is if its a shootout...They are NOT going to outscore the Gators unless they turn it into a track-meet...
I'll predict that they'll win a game 1-0 before I predict a loss...
Florida's going to treat them like a sassy mouthed, red-headed stepchild...
GO DAWGS!
If he doesn't spot you 17 points off turnovers, we win that game by a FG...
I'd be woofing it up right now if I were you, and oh by the way...Your defense is GARBAGE...
I thought you were above the imaginary scenarios! I was just giving you a little crap and you had to go all "GARBAGE" on me.
GO DAWGS!!
I don't deal in hypotheticals, and I can tell you this...
You're no Florida...
...and that little bitch of a running back you've got that dances in the huddle and then classlessly taunts our fanbase after the game is over is unfortunately NOT indicative of the rest of your fanbase. You were there in good numbers, and your fans were polite, and well-mannered.
My father & I walked out with two that were wonderful. Had a great conversation with them over how worried they were over the defense...
But, let me tell you one thing...Neither side of the ball had more talent than its opponent from Baton Rouge...
I cannot say the same thing about Florida...
Guess you'll just have to learn how to deal...
Just kidding. I'm really hoping that both teams put it all on the field and leave the monkey business at home. As much as I've assailed Richt since last year's game, I have to admit that his little stunt has reinvigorated what had become a stale rivalry. Here's hoping it remains a vigorous, safe, sane rivalry.
We won't be doing a lot of partying before or after the game, unfortunately. We're driving up from Orlando before the game and driving back after. My daughter is riding in an equestrian competition Sunday morning, so no victory laps / consolation drinks for Mr and Mrs RG.
Expansion
It is clear the MWC as it is does not fit the bill of a BCS conference. I ran Sagarin's rankings on my proposed expansion and found:
MWAC: 72.71
Now this closes the gap with the Big East significantly. If the ELO-CHESS numbers, used by the BCS, are used the gap would be closed. Fresno State is not helping much. Sagarin would have Boise State leading the MWAC and Fresno State between Air Force and New Mexico. While the MWC and its expanded counter part do well at the top the middle is weak. If the leaders have an off year no one is left to pick up the slack.
The danger is a team like Hawaii winning the conference, with embarrassing results.
Top 25 Radar
As a measure of the number of contenders I thought the number of teams in BCS GURU's tracking chart for each conference gives a good measure of how many teams at least show up on the top 25 radar.
SEC: 12/12
BIG 10: 11/11
ACC: 11/12
PAC 10: 9/10
BIIG EAST: 7/8
BIG 12: 9/12
MWAC: 8/12
MWC: 5/9
WAC: 4/8
IND: 2/4
MAC: 5/13
Sun Belt: 2/7
Top 25 teams
Usually two or three conferences dominate the top 25 with 5-6 spots each. This leaves 2-3 spots each for the other BCS conferences, with a usurper or two usually getting a spot. The MWC usually gets one and has gotten up to 3 in the top 25 (2 in the final top 25). 2 teams in the final top 25 would be expected from an expanded MWC, with the top team likely to be in the top 15, even with a single loss. The MWC has averaged 5 bowl eligible teams over the last 4 years and has an excellent bowl record over those years. The MWC, if expanded, is strong enough at the top.
They are consistently very weak in the bottom 4, though the actual teams in those spots vary (except permanent member SDSU).
Conclusion
All this supports the claim that the MWC needs to expand AND improve, especially at the bottom, to be a BCS conference.
Using the gold standard (SEC) as a measuring stick, how many MWC would be favored today over Mississippi State, Sag's lowest rated SEC team? Maybe that's an unfair/biased question, but that's the standard the MWC is going to have to seek.
The issue for all conferences outside the BCS is the issuance of the "non-BCS" stigma that hurts them in recruiting...
Teams outside the BCS would have a better chance of leveling the recruiting field thus improving their program by being able to use the promise of an actual chance to play for a NC...
The BCS is doing exactly what it was designed to do...
Keep the money and glory in the pockets of the big boys while dangling a carrot stick in front of the rest...
It's an unfair system from the get go...
BCS School: "Come here and we can easily reach a BCS bowl and possibly the BCS CG even with two losses"...
Non-BCS School: "Come here and maybe if we go undefeated and enough people lose we have a slim shot of playing one of the two loss teams in a BCS bowl"...
Which one do you pick, Ben?
While also watching the terrific development and immediate impact Troy Smith benefitted from for his preparation "at the next level" also influenced Pryor's decision to attend tOSU?
I'm gonna say no to that...
Pryor wanted to go where he felt he would have the best shot at a BCS title and national exposure...
Take a guy like Justin Jungblut - offers at Colorado & Oregon State, but has committed to Boise State.
Mitch Mathews - offers at Oregon, Stanford, Or State, Washington... committed to BYU.
Future NFL guy Wayman James - Offers from Georgia Tech, Nebraska, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech and others... committed to TCU.
Jurell Thompson - another future Horned Frog - offers from Ole Miss, Arkansas, Georgia Tech, Arizona State and so on.
My point is that kids are going to pick schools where they can develop and get attention. There's no point in these 3 & 4 star guys going to the top five schools, because they're going ride the bench for 2-3 years before they get their shot.
Recruiting today is about more than BCS, IMO.
However...
IMO he hasn't had the impact of a Tomlinson...
And where is the attention? On the BCS...
And where are the best coaches? In the BCS...
Remove the "Non-BCS" stigma and maybe Saban is coaching somewhere other than Bama...
The top non BCS teams, who are ranked at some part of every year, have built state of the art training facilities to compete. The also get more work ethic from their players.
They may lack a step in talent, but teamwork, motivation and discipline count for a lot.
4 Alabama 91.38
7 Florida 88.43
8 Georgia 87.38
13 Utah 85.24
14 TCU 85.07
21 LSU 79.89
33 BYU 77.82
38 South Carolina 77.04
41 Vanderbilt 76.1
43 Air Force 75.71
45 Mississippi 75.55
48 Kentucky 74.85
61 Tennessee 71.38
71 Auburn 70.06
83 Arkansas 68
85 New Mexico 67.45
88 Colorado State 65.98
90 UNLV 65.84
98 Mississippi State 63.65
135 San Diego State 56.22
145 Wyoming 53.81
I count 7 of 9. Only 4 of 9 for Arkansas, Auburn, Tennessee Kentucky and Mississippi though.
But, as the SEC is declining, I am sure now that Armaggedon is upon us. We could have recovered from most any other thing. But not this. This will certainly have an effect on the American psyche. All hope is lost. There is no way around this now. The end of America, as we have known it, is officially over. There is no hope!
Now THAT is putting things in perspective! ....big bad Merrill Lynch gets bought up...Bear Sterns goes belly up....AIG needs the a helping hand from Uncle Sam...the ENTIRE mortgage banking system is nationalized in one fell swoop under the guise of a "bailout"...socialism is being entertained as a viable alternative to the American econmic system...the dollar and the stock market free fall, while unemployment and oil prices sky rocket....
...and now we know the catalyst of the collapse of Ameican capitalism as we know it: forget Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, the war on terrorism, runaway national debts, out of control federal budgets, or the collapse of the credit indusry...
...SEC football jammed up, and that has caused a domino effect on the entire national economic system...genius!
Tommy Trojan for president! ...and Alan Greenspan for SEC* Commish (that's Southeastern Conference, not Securities & Exchange Commision--we can put Mike Slive in charge of that SEC).
GO GATORS!!
Well, I just could not see it any other way. It all makes sense. Times have really changed when Mississippi opens up as a -6 "chalk" over Auburn and Tulsa is a -7 favorite over Arkansas. Something is terribly wrong with the universe.
Regardless, that was last year and this is this year. Stop living in the past, the SEC is not what it was a year ago, and will be worse off next year when Tebow, Harvin, Stafford, and Moreno leave.
Those two teams happen to have a lot more talent waiting to break out.
With young teams on the rise like Alabama and Ole Miss, plus Auburn and Tennessee fixing problems in the spring, the SEC will continue to be strong. LSU is playing with a lot of young player, as is Arkansas. 4 players don't make this conference, Princess.
Georgia is a 2 year wonder, they'll go back to being bad next year after Moreno and Stafford leave. Florida wont have anything w/o Tebow and Harvin. Alabama will be a force to be reckoned with next year.
Who else you got? Vandy? South Carolina? LSU could maybe be good next year. Other than that, the SEC has peaked last year and now you get your turn to go into a downward spiral for a couple of seasons.
I was not arguing that the SEC is the best conference year in and year out. My point is this : Every year, the SEC has strong teams contending for the National Title. Just because 4 players may or may not be playing at this level next season doesn't mean the SEC will go spiraling downward. You are ignorant if you think so.
LSU has talent, but they have an erratic, mindless coach who is slowly tearing Saban's masterpiece down. so theyll get gradually worse and worse until they hire a new coach. but they have a monopoly in their state.
Auburn will be down for a while, but Alabama stepped up to take their place. Tennessee will also be down for a while, while other teams get even stronger.
The thing is, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, Texas, and California are the best recruiting states in america, and have been for a while.
4 of them are in the SEC.....
but one thing that won't change for a llllong time Marko:
The SEC's best can beat anyone in the country, except maybe USC...
November 8th...A C-Note, biatch...
DO IT...
i'm not throwing down a "c-note" because i think lsu has a good chance of winning.
and why take a chance of losing a perfect season and a "c-note" all in one day?
Put your money where your mouth is...
$100...I'll FedEx it to Kevin to hold for me...
The only thing you'd take is my address when you overnighted me a check or money order, along with LSU's ballzack in your mouf'....
Do one thing, Gump...Avoid me if you think for an INSTANT I'm going to hear a LICK about my team from the likes of a hypocrite like you...
Don't you have a bus to go throw John Parker Wilson under?
What a great "fan" you are...
I tell you, Bama_Babe...You wonder why I hate 'Bama fans with such a-pardon the pun-"Purple Passion", so to speak?
It's because Ringo Gump here shoots his mouth off...
When you drop the soap in Tiger Stadium, I wonder how soon you'll be back here talking about how our "mindless, erratic" coach once again ran it off in you, and then broke it off at the handle...ONCE AGAIN...
Anytime you're ready to put your money where your mouth is, I will GLADLY take it off your hands, Gump...
in other words, i don't have any money to pay you if i lose, and there's about a 40% chance that will happen.
however, i have an offer for you.
if alabama wins, i get to choose the name you post under for November
and vice versa.
deal?
Do you still chew - or are you talkin' out of a tube that protrudes out of your windpipe? Man, you seem to be pretty disturbed about the ol' nicotine? Was that you who was doin' them commercials, where the two dudes are playin' Okie music, and singin' out their windpipes?
Best omelets anywhere...
Particularly fond of the Texas Cheesesteak Omelet....
With 'em double scattered, covered and smothered...
hold the onions...
scattered/covered...
with and order of eggs scrambled on the side
That's been my order for years. I (with some friends) actually started a campaign to get a Waffle House built in Clemson when I was in school. We didn't have one, and I was successful. That place is absolutely amazing. It really is phenomenal how well their food goes with a stomach full of beer.
covered (cheese), topped (chili), and peppered (jalepenos).
less than $3 and way more than you need.
I can understand where you're coming from.
Just please don't think all of us Bama fans are the same. (Hopefully, I have been some proof of that..)
And I am talking to everyone when I say that line above.
;)
I proved my point...He's actually afraid of a coach and a team filled with said coach's recruits, yet he refers to the coach as mindless and erratic...
Yet he doesn't stop yapping about him...He's like Paris Hilton's Chihuahua whose stumbled upon her coke stash...all hyped up for no real reason, barking not necessarily for a reason, but just to do it...
I knew he was more interested in taking a shot in my coach than in showing faith in his own team-which is a hallmark of his posting habits here. I merely wanted to point it out and take him down a few notches on the ladder of success he's found his team's moved a few rungs up on.
In other words, I'm not betting you, I only want to bet little B_C...
Besides, it's not like he said anything outlandish. Your coach is a bit of an oddball, a good coach deserving of your praises, but an oddball none the less. He wears his hat too high on his head and he has a tendency to call plays that some people might question. Big deal!
I believe I recall you making some much more malicious comments about his coach, but BC's reaction wasn't to drop F-bombs and try to belittle you. He took your shots and kept posting about his team. Grow up TE and stop trying to take bets with college kids.
Now as for myself, I WILL take your bet. Actually, I am calling you out. Take my bet that your team will lose to Alabama on Nov. 8 or how about YOU shut your long winded "yapper".
Excellent post; agree entirely, especially bout the college kid bit.
GO GATORS!!
Please point to the "malicious" things I've said about his coach? Never have I denigrated his intelligence. I have pointed out-time and again-his tendencies and his mindset, gleaned from experience...Nothing more.
I have said-time and again-that I harbor no ill will towards Nick, though I see right through him.
I'm not sure there's an actual job title for "Fanblogs Revisionist Historian" here, Observer...perhaps you might want to work on said powers of Observation...They're failing you these days...
I'm quite comfortable in my own hypocrisy, but in this case, your drummed up allegations aren't even close to accurate...
You can call me out all you like, I have neither the time nor the inclination to get into some bellicose back-and-forth with the likes of you...
I'm interested to know who you root for, though...
I was not allowed to call them mindless, or erratic, though I was once busted on a Rivals site for talking about our former AD Joe Dean in less than glowing terms...
I just realized...I sound like the old man who says, "In MYYYYYY day, we were respectful..."
But you can also go back before the AP and see where 1933 Michigan, 1934 Minnesota, and 1935 Minnesota.
But then again you go back even further than that & see where you had the following:
1906: Princeton
1907: Yale
1908: Penn
1909: Yale
1910: Harvard
1911: Princeton
1912: Harvard
1913: Harvard
As you should be able to read he said THE ONLY to win 3 in a row. That is a flat out lie. I find that is what some pro-SEC people do on here...they spit out lies to make themselves feel better about their conf. I wouldn't not have had a problem if he just said something like...The LAST conf to do it...do you understand?
i cannot believe this.
alright whatever. if this country REALLY doesnt want an SEC team to win the NC again, i guess you've got us. we're outnumbered.
the SEC as a whole isn't as strong this year as it was last year.
we got 2 spread coaches, one at auburn, one at arkansas, that came in and destroyed two perfectly good programs. also, Nick Saban's champions/leaders all left LSU. and i couldnt even start to tell you what's going on at Tennessee.
but the top of the conference is still there.
Alabama - this team is just tough. nobody wants to mess with Alabama this year. i mean, people act as though they've been struggling and just hanging on for dear life. They have trailed for just over a minute, the entire year and have only trailed in one game. I haven't been worried about losing once all year, at any time during a game.
Florida - that spread craze that has engulfed college football? well this team has the best spread in the country. this team has the US Track team on its roster. Think Texas, but with better skill guys, much tougher in the trenches, and a much better defense.
it's all good though, you just made a simple mistake
in my post, i was referring to THIS year's florida offense. not last year's.
It was the UF defense that was ineffective more specifically the secondary...
It only applies to this years offense. The offense from last year, with the Hypesman Trophy winner at the helm, does not count - don't you know? This offense is different than last years version. Last year's version wasn't very good at all. They didn't have any good players like they do this year. They all came this year.
i think either way Alabama would've come out on top this year, but i think if we faced last year's teams we might have 1 or 2 losses by the end of the regular season, instead of looking to go undefeated.
don't think that bama is just winning by default.
Alabama improved SIGNIFICANTLY from last year to this year.
BOTTOM LINE:
This is just a down year in college football. no conference, and no team looks really dominant.
i think the Big XII is better top-to-bottom this year than the SEC, but i think the top of the SEC is stronger than the top of the Big XII.
I think Alabama/Florida/Georgia/ could beat any combination of Texas/Oklahoma State/Texas Tech
so i'll put it like this:
T1 Big XII
T1 SEC
3. Pac 10
4. ACC
5. Big Ten
6. Big East
Hookem Tide
Roll Horns
probably because due to our team's success, our homerism is through the roof.
but think about it.
the sec, big ten, acc, big east, and pac 10 all went down a notch from last year.
the big xii obviously went up a notch.
and about the CCG. only in a perfect world man....
the pac 10 would pick up boise state and utah, the big eleven would pick up notre dame, and both add a championship game.
then each conference champ would enter a playoff for the NC.
only in a perfect world....
that's the most ridiculous statement i've ever heard.
Florida ABSOLUTELY has a better defense than any team in the Big XII.
you're such a homer.
you really think that Big XII teams would be running up the score against SEC defenses?
absolutely not. there is no defense in the Big XII. you'll find that out come bowl season, where every year, Texas Tech gains about 300 yds less than their season average.
that's the most ridiculous statement i've ever heard."
Good idea. You should stop using it, too.
don't get mad at me because i use it against the Big Ten.
how else can i explain to you what everyone else knows?
that is, the Big Ten doesn't have as much talent as everywhere else.
for whatever reason, the sunshine states just produce more talent. and have for a while.
i mean, it should tell you something when OSU sucks up the best players in the region every year, and they can't compete with either Florida or LSU.
stay in denial all you want, and the tables may turn eventually, but when the high schools aren't producing in your area, that's not something that just changes overnight, or over 1 offseason.
Quite the contrary. I'm laughing at you for alternately using, then lambasting, this goofy logic you use whenever it suits you. How about you start using facts to make your points? Has that ever occurred to you?
"how else can i explain to you what everyone else knows?
that is, the Big Ten doesn't have as much talent as everywhere else."
So, in addition to your lack of math and logic skills, you also have a reading comprehension problem. Not surprising. Once again, I've said in our conversations before and in other threads that I think the Big 10 (11) has been down the last couple of years. This Sagarin ranking surprised me.
Let me explain something else to you. Ohio State has won 4 BCS bowl games. One of which was a National Title Game. Alabama hasn't won any. I see you chose to completely ignore that inconvenient fact in our earlier conversation.
"stay in denial all you want"
Pot, meet Kettle.
So your statement about OSU not being able to compete with Florida or LSU has nothing to do with lack of talent, just look at some starting rosters in the NFL trust me the talent was there. I have my own reasoning on what happened the last two years and it has everything to do with coaching and game planning, but I'm sure you're not interested in that.
You said maybe someday the tables will turn, well I hope not because Ohio St. is stacked with talent they got the best of the best last year and are leading the recruiting class this year last I checked. Now where Ohio St. has their problem is utilizing that talent.
Do you know what I find interesting though? All the good coaches from up north.
are from up north?
or are in the north?
if they're all from up north, then they all moved down south. now i find that interesting.
if they're all in the north, then i guess Nick Saban and Pete Carrol are on recruiting trips...
but either way you're wrong......
So explain to me again how I'm wrong or do you just insist on talking out of your ass? Nice to know you keep up on the origins of your own coach.
Funny how you ignore every other part of my previous post also, come on give me a mindless rant.
I'm guess'n you're posting from comfortably south of the M-D line...about the virtues of the great white north!
I grew up listenting that sh*t all my life, and you can't help but wonder everytime you hear it...if it's so great up fk'n north, WTF are you doing down here?????
GO GATORS!!
At the end of my post which BC chose to ignore except for the last tidbit, I stated the following. "Do you know what I find interesting though? All the good coaches from up north.
And then BC responded by quoting me and then asking the following. "From up north or are in the north?" Then he goes on to use his own coach to unknowingly bolster my argument.
So I ask you, how did you interpret the before mentioned as him asking me if I was from up north? Don't worry though you're not alone in your reading comprehension deficiencies. I'm going to help BC comprehend some things also, so then maybe we can have a real discussion.
By the way I never stated the north is better than the south. I mean that's a real stretch to come to that conclusion from what was said. But maybe that's your thing, if you can't think of a good rebuttal for a position in which you disagree, you just change the position all together and then start your rant. Clever.
Yes, I mis-read BC's post. I was going to edit when I ralized it, but the edit feature was disabled (no lie). I thought about a corrective post, but instead elected to just leave the ball on the tee for you to have your fun knock'n it out of the park....
...so what to you do? You accuse me of viewing PORN...then, you go and accuse BC of viewing GAY PORN--with no basis for either allegation.
Which leads to one simple conclusion: YOU have PORN (and probably GAY PORN) on YOUR polluted mind.
You could've gone so many different ways with that, and that's where your perverted mind takes you?
Douchebag.
GO GATORS!!
Douchbag?
You pretty much proved you can't respond to any of my legit arguments and this is just going to resort in a back and forth name calling, insulting, and degrading dialog. So no need to respond I'll admit it. I'm a big homo who loves the porn.
Hookem-Horns
not true.
and if most of the good coaches are from the north, my point is, why did they move down south??.....
talent perhaps?
better competition?
more money?
better climate?
the list goes on
Read my post below
Hookem-Horns
BTW I find your post most entertaining
Roll Horns
Hookem-Tide
Let's say your girlfriend (this is an assumption on my part but it's hypothetical anyways) logs on to your PC. And lets say you forgot to clear the history and she stumbles across some gay porn you've been working in on the side. She might say "What the hell is ALL the gay porn doing on here BC?"
Now do you think she meant all the gay porn on the internet was on your PC? NO, of course not she just meant there was a ridiculous amount and that she always had a hunch you where a little fruity. Remember this is just a hypothetical example so don't go admitting anything, your secret is still safe.
Now if you want to argue about where all the good coaches end up and why, we can do that. But lets try to keep straight what I say first so I'm not repeating myself so much.
...along with PRINCESS MARKO, posting from TAMPA....
...about how great the great white north is....
...LMAO!!!
GO GATORS!!
They come down here (FL), Texas, Cali, etc., wear their Buckeye/Michigan/Wisc'y gear, spittle in your face about how great those schools are, how the coaches are all from up north, FB was invented up north, and how everything is better up north...
...as they bask in the sunshine of their new found homes.
The joke is on them though; their kids become Gators, and Canes, and 'noles, and 'horns, and Trojans....
...b/c their kids ain't as stupid as they thought they'd be.
Kid to Dad: "...if Michigan/Ohio...is so great, why are we here?..."
Dad: "...ah, dah, uh, duh...."
Kid: "...gotcha'. Go Gators.../hook'm horns/fight on!"
GO GATORS!!
I don't love you, you don't love me. . .
OU vs Bama...2-1-1 OU!
BOOMER!
Do you really think that Ole Miss or Vandy would have a winning record in the B-12 because of their outstanding defense?? I really dont know, because they havent played in the B-12, but I dont think they would have a winning season like they do playing in the SEC. Dont get me wrong I really respect the SEC, but some of your post are just plum silly. I really dont care who's who are whats what, because I didnt go to A&M.
You said I'm a homer?-Do what? My post was not ridiculous- yours was
Call me crazy - but why don't we ALL wait until the rest of the season pans out and THEN see how the final conference standings are.
Because in the end, doesn't it come down to who can beat who in the bowl games? Head-to-head. Not stat-to-stat. Conference A vs. Conference B. Not # of ranked teams vs. # of poor teams.
Call me crazy, but I have a feeling many of you (no matter which conference you are representing) are going to be eating these statements like cereal come bowl season.
;)
I like to think most of yall are, or have the potential, to be gentlemen. I'm a glass is half full kinda girl though.... ;)
I found an interesting Greek recipe for Hemlock Tea, attributed to Socrates.
We'll have our day, as we always do, AFTER the annual reckoning known as the bowls.
GO GATORS!!
Now this is where you might be mistaken. "But I have a feeling many of you (no matter which conference you are representing) are going to be eating these statements like cereal come bowl season".
This is Fanblogs - where only the strong survive. Most folks on here follow some pretty good teams. Most of their favorite teams will win their bowl games. The great argument is festering over what Bowl Game, who should play in it, and who even deserves to play in it. That is the debate. Right now your in the "hot seat". Your in a bad spot. While most on here are gonna go easy on ya', as they see you as green, I am not gonna cut any slack. I can clearly see that you do seem to know your game. So, don't mind me, as I continue my onslaught against an overrated Alabama team. And, you got to be very careful, about statements like the one above. Should Alabama somehow get smoked in a bowl game - those words can come back to haunt you. Hey, what am I talkin' about? Nobody will ever beat the Trojans again - in a BCS bowl game. That day came and went.
In saying that statement, I was not hinting at the fact that Bama would win it all. I was talking about everyone on here - and the fact that what WE ALL say could come back to haunt us. Meaning, there's still much football to be played, games to be won, games to be lost, polls to be changed, controversy to happen.
I was taking my own advice with that statement - as obviously I didn't predict Bama's future. ;)
And you have to watch these " gentlemen" BB, they can get a bit riled up sometimes
Yeah, right...
That designation of Co-Coordinator was to keep him here. Pelini offered him the DC/Asst. HC job at Nebraska, & AU & Arky also offered him their DC jobs at one point or another...
But, make no mistake...This is Mallory's show...We have a guy on our board...He's from Seattle and went to LSU...He flew back Sunday and sat next to Verne Lundquist on the way back West...Had some VERY interesting insight into how they answered questions in the CBS interviews on Friday...
I have also heard that some players are no longer buying in...at all...
Miles needs to make a change, YESTERDAY. We had an offense that was capable of contending for the SEC this year...but, our decision to go with co-DC's has cost us dearly...
I've said it before...Mallory has NO coordination experience, and Peveto has 4 prior stops along the way where he's set records for sacks and takeaways...Peveto isn't calling the plays, and Mallory is...
Think that has anything to do with the fact that Mallory lettered for Michigan from '84-'87?
GARBAGE...
Big 12 is obviously the strongest conference this year, but I don't think the Big 10 is as strong top to bottom as the SEC is. We're at best the #2 strongest this year, even in the midst of power swings.
course yall got us beat far as fanantic-fans and conference-loyalty like no other including those MWC fans-Ben excluded
The Big 12 is by far the best conference with the Big 10 a distant 2nd.
We'll see how Florida does with Tebow, Harvin and Company leaving next year.
Buckeyes & wolverines, get'n each others' backs...the end of days must surely be upon us...
GO GATORS!!
Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"?
Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath of God type stuff.
Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.
Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!
Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave!
Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!
Hookem-Horns
Real awesome!
Not that Auburn should be talking...
It is laughable that the big ten is ahead though! I bet Vandy could have won more than 5 games this year if they were a big ten team!
GO DAWGS!!
Big 12: 1.127
ACC: 0.804
Big 10: 0.776
Ben - Would you say the above is a more realistic analysis of where we'll end up at the end of the season?
The only significant change will be due to the Bowl games, though the SEC may pass the ACC in Sagarin's ranking with Georgia-GT and Florida-FSU ahead.
My personal perception is:
Big 12
SEC
ACC
Big 10
MWC
Big East
PAC 10
C-USA
WAC
MAC
Sun Belt
I agree with the comment that the NCG should be between the winner of the Big 12 and the winner of the SEC. They are definitely the toughest conferences in the FBS this year.
Florida=fastest team in America if anyone begs to differ PLEASE give me an argument
BOOMER SOONER!
And the Pac 1 (i meant to do that)is too high.
The SEC was over-rated coming into this year, and its showing.
The Big Ten has a better middle part of the conference. Michigan State, Northwestern, MInnesota are all solid teams this year.
It is bad enough that I have to put up with 3 idiot college coaches voting Penn State number 1 this week. Now the freaking BCS computers are totally screwed up.
What next? President Obama!!! God this country is going to hell thank to you yankees.
The real national title game in college football will be this weekend between Texas and Texas Tech. Not 2 months from now.
Thank God you guys lost the war. I can't imagine what would have happened had we not invaded Normandie. Why don't you just move on up to Idaho and enlist with one of them thar militia's? You don't need to be on any football blog. You need to be runnin' around out in the woods tryin' to save America from the "boogey-man". Better yet maybe you'll run into "Big Foot", pop a couple caps and bag him, and be able to mount his head over your fireplace. Crawl back under your rock, farmer!
And don't get me goin' on that "yankee" dope-dealin' mother fughin' President that you Texan's stuck in "our" White House. I am whiter than any "Geisha Girl's" azz - and I will tear you apart, boy! I have personally seen with my own eyes, black men blown apart, for the very dirt that you are standing on. It's azzholes like you that have made this once great country what it is today. BTW, buttsuck, it ain't no "black man" that is responsible for anything going wrong in this country. Those policies are enacted by morons, just like you, who are too feeble and uneducated to ever really understand what is really going on in this country. It's called "extreme greed". It's created by your moronic idealogy. Someday, all of your land will be taken away from you, by the very people that you are electing to do it. Did your daddy tell you that? I didn't think that he'd ever be smart enough to understand that. It's only been going on from the beginning of time. Maybe you should have went to school past the 3rd grade. Too bad that your daddy had to stick you out on a tractor in the lower forty. You might have been able to make a difference had you ever received an education.
By the way, he didn't bring up race; you did.
Didn't mean to piss you off. There has been several stupid azz blogs by this guy runnin' down "yankees". Obama smokes crack and deals dope. On and on and on. Joe, I live in a 3rd world country here in Los Angeles. After the Miami connection was closed down (and the Columbian's had to give a cut to Mexico), and NAFTA was created, those dead bodies being piled up in Juarez and Tijauna don't have much to do with lettuce and tomatoes. Fact is, Joe, I ain't even no "Yankee". In fact, I absolutely do not like "yankees". But, this guy is a clown. He doesn't even understand who the "enemy" is. He made all the "political" statements about Obama and Clinton's wife. He's just a dumbazz peckerwood who don't know sheeit from shinola. Sorry if that has to offend you. But, Joe, I do know who our common enemy is - and it's anybody who calls themselves a "politician". They all ought to be tried for treason. Sorry if that offends anyone. They are all very lucky that I am not in charge - that's all I can say.
One thing that guy said is true
Texas @ Texas Tech is the probably bigger than any other game
Its like a Championship game every week for Longhorn fans
Two top ten undefeated teams- the winner could represent the B-12 south to face the B-12 north winner again
I just don't like it when folks propagate generalizations about southerners, but I guess they are there because of certain people like this.
Kinda like ole Arnold aint really from Cali either and doesn't really represent everybody from Cali either, but he did have to buy a pair of boots for Rick Perry-Texas A&M
Hookem-Horns
Of course he's a "yankee" just like Arnold is. I think that I put that in the post. They're all "yankees". They were all "educated" at Harvard. That is why everything is such a mess. Now, it does seem as if we still have people, who are oblivious to anything being wrong. These "educated yankees" have completely bankrupted the country. What they all really are is "criminals". I'd try each and every one of them for "high treason", along with the CEO's and lobbyist' of any Corporation, that ever offered any politician a bribe. After the trial was over, I'd offer them up to the "convicts" in every State Pen in America, to decide what to do with them all. The Judges in this country are not fit to decide anything - and they'd be on trial anyway. So, the point is, is that it isn't any "one person" who is responsible for anything going wrong. There are just a few - and they hold most of the money that is in the world.
b/t/w: where's Sancho Panza?
GO GATORS!!
7 days without Beef makes one weak
God Bless our Troops
Hookem-Tide
Roll Horns
A retraction here, Rivals is back up to snuff, and my own ignorance, might be at fault.