Fanblogs.com - Latest Comments in The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Zac — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:49:57 -0000

Tsk, ya thillies...

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Zac — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:48:11 -0000

I'll have to plea the 5th on this one. All I can tell you is the Jawas said it a lot in the 1st Star Wars movie. Wat da heck; it woiks fer me.

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

War_Eagle_Atlanta — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:07:14 -0000

I think that the 2003 Auburn team that started 0-2 is worthy of mention, too. They weren't an AP preseason #1, but some selectors started them there. Essentially it was the same team that would go undefeated a year later, you know, because of their cupcake OOC schedule...

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

PittsburghTiger — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:40:24 -0000

Pitt was one blown coverage away from beating BYU that day. It was a late TD pass....sent Pitt into the tailspin they are just getting out of. And sent BYU on the way to the National Championship. I think BYU played a crappy Michigan team in the Holiday Bowl.

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Ramblin' Gator — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:08:37 -0000

:-)

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Porcine — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:19:30 -0000

Hold me.

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Ramblin' Gator — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:03:58 -0000

I'm so scared, Porcine - how 'bout you?

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

joe — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:08:19 -0000

Mississippi-unemployable work force? Maybe you should ask Nissan, they are here, and Toyota, they are COMING.

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Porcine — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:02:24 -0000

"All other SEC folk get their posts treated like a doublewide in a tornado..."

Even me?

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Ben Prather — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:31:36 -0000

A great argument against the statement that teams like Auburn 2004 have no room to complain that they got shafted by a low start before the season?

By the way, the SEC as a whole had their worst, BY FAR, OCC performance in 2004.

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Ben Prather — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:27:25 -0000

H is clarified as part of THIS THREAD.

Scroll down about 2/3rds of the way to Tom Blogical's posts starting the h discussion. Its history is even explored in this thread.

Sorry for the stats threads. I give a 75% chance that I am responsible for it.

The nice thing is we have thread of all flavors:

Fashion threads
Statistical based threads
Paparazzi Who Just got Caught threads
Lets Get the Party Started Already! threads

Just skip the ones you don't like, for example, my most recent ones.

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

-TE- — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:15:38 -0000

There are plenty of folks here who could...

WEA, T-Mac, & BigTide are probably the only ones in the SEC that can, though :)

(Now that I think about it...Gatorhippy can, from time to time)

All other SEC folk get their posts treated like a doublewide in a tornado...

But Big XII'ers are free to denigrate without fear of reprisal...

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Pigskin17 — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:50:47 -0000

Mississippi fought segregation?

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

OU_Ron — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:17:01 -0000

TE, I would never direct a negative thought toward you, I can only imagine the backlash and word thrash that I would receive..........actually, that might be my nomination for the definition of the " h "

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

-TE- — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:59:26 -0000

OU_Ron,

Did you take the part about oppressingly statistically oriented threads part to heart? Was that directed at moi? I assure that I don't know who all gets involved in those, but there just not to my liking. I don't have anyone I can call out for being the root of those threads, so my apologies if you're taking that one a tad too personally...

They're just not my bag, podnuh...

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

AUtigerman — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:35:36 -0000

1984 Auburn preseason ranked #1. Who wins NT? BYU. preseason rank? they werent ranked.

So then whats the point in preseason rankings?

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

WarEagleFan — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:33:38 -0000

That's for people who think their Sh@t don't stink

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

OU_Ron — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:19:00 -0000

cake fart, well that could be one of those that travel up you spine, seeps into your mind and makes you throw out $hitty remarks and thoughts...

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

-TE- — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:50:06 -0000

Can someone clarify h, for me...Seriously...I have been here most of the offseason and have managed to miss it...Maybe it was in one of those oppressingly statistically oriented threads my eyes glaze over after getting two paragraphs into...

Oh, and Kev...What in the hell is a cake fart?

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Adam Armstrong — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:12:44 -0000

I know this is about #1's but the preseason #3 ranking of Alabama in 2000 where they finished 3-whatever has to make the list of worst performances under high expectations, what do ya'll think?

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

PittsburghTiger — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:49:14 -0000

I remember that Pitt season very well. Too well honestly.

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Ben Prather — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:45:43 -0000

It appears to mean FIRST!!!!!

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

aVoiceInSC — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:32:00 -0000

This might be a stupid question, but I'm willing to risk it. What does "ooo-tee-nee" mean?

Re: The Worst #1 Ranked Teams in History

Zac — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:04:32 -0000

It's hard to argue with success, as is in this case, a lack there-of.

Oh, and another thing...OOO-TEE-NEE!!!