<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Fanblogs.com - Latest Comments in Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://fanblogs.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://fanblogs.disqus.com/unnofficial_bcs_standings_week_6/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:23:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2944043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"...They could be married to Halle Berry and complain because she spends too much money on lingerie..."   LOL!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I'm afraid this article is pretty well grounded in fact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For my part, I remain perpetually positive and upbeat on the Gators, and savor every second of Gator FB I can watch, even watching the losses multiple times (currently between 3-4th quarters of Ole Miss game, for my 3rd viewing of it).  Yet I readily acknowledge that I stand out as the exception amoungst the more conspicuous members of the Gator Nation--key phrase there being "more conspicuous"--not greater in number, just more vocal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the "old school" Gator fans--graduates of the "wait'll next year" generation(s)--still appreciate Gator FB  just being competitive, and as a means of celebrating O&amp;amp;B commraderie.  For e.g.--"Mr. Two Bits"--not the poster on here who goes by that handle, but the guy who inspired said handle--George Edmonson--is THE MOST loyal, die hard, positive, upbeat fan--not just in Gator Nation, but quite possibly in just about the entire world of sports fandom.  He is representative of the positive component of the Gator faithful--which, IMO, comprises a greater number of the Gator Nation, than the unsatiable "novo riche" component.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day though, no matter how spoiled, how arrogant, how unrealistic the expectations--you'd be hard pressed to find a more loyal following anywhere.  The "wait'll next year" roots run deep, and the Orange &amp;amp; Blue contamination of the blood, deeper still--far too deeply entrenched to ever be cured by a mere run of mediocrity or even futility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;b/t/w: Ironic that Mike Bianchi wrote the article; he has noticably high expectations of the Gators--though he is pretty positive about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GO GATORS!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TampaGator</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2941991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, that's probably one of the most interesting analogies I've ever heard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shiguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2934385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Strength of schedule maybe?  Who knows, besides that one flop of a game(which every team has a year) USC should be top five. That said, its hard when the other teams are undefeated in the silly BCS way of ranking teams.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PrinceMarko</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2934364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, this is EXACTLY what I've been talking about with Florida Gator fans:  &lt;a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/orl-bianchi0808oct08,0,7660784.column" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/orl-bianchi0808oct08,0,7660784.column"&gt;http://www.orlandosentinel....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PrinceMarko</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:39:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2929686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ben, your post is part of the reason computers &amp;amp; I don't get along.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2929662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not convinced that Alabama is a better team than LSU, let alone the #2 team in the country.  Yes, they won at GA, a team many of us figured to lose 2-3 games this year.  LSU won at Auburn, a team many of us picked to win the SEC West.  (Bama has yet to play either, and struggled against KY.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently, I'm not convinced UT is a better team than BYU, let alone ranked 9th.  I'm not entirely convinced (though I got closer after this weekend) MO should be ranked 3rd, let alone above TX.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given Vandy's record, not to mention they were underdog to everyone but RICE, I'm surprised they're not ranked higher.  Speaking of which, why is 5-0 OK St not ranked higher?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm with most of you guys.  Rankings are like ear-wax.  Everybody's got their own, but nobody else gets it.  At least it's another wacky season; one in which the phrase play-off should be frequently spoken.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2929122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's hard to argue with success.  While the Big 12 isn't in the bag yet, it's at least likely down to 2 teams (maybe 3).  The SEC is still wide open.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2924882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Why are the Trojans ranked so low? Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tommy_Trojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:15:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2924572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would be interested in a link.  The link above uses the actual BCS formula and the data that is available, which is now all but one of the computers.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Prather</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:55:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2923916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The "mock" BCS standing maybe, the real one never.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blackdawg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:08:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2923539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The mock BCS standings I saw had Vandy #8m ahead of Utah &amp;amp; georgia... that would be awesome...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fosterkeats</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2902517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BCS Computer Component top 10:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) Alabama 0.99&lt;br&gt;2) Missouri 0.92&lt;br&gt;3) Oklahoma 0.85&lt;br&gt;4) Texas 0.83&lt;br&gt;5) Vanderbilt 0.82&lt;br&gt;6) Utah 0.79&lt;br&gt;7) Penn State 0.73&lt;br&gt;8) Northwestern 0.62&lt;br&gt;9) Georgia 0.57&lt;br&gt;10) Boise State 0.55&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe the BCS should allow the computers to use MOV a little?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Prather</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:23:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnofficial BCS Standings - Week 6</title><link>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007786.php#comment-2900860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First!&lt;br&gt;If your in the big 12 or SEC, win, move on, and you will get to play for the prize.&lt;br&gt;Wreck em'!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tyler_Tech</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>